Methodological Overreach
'Methodological overreach
' refers to the inappropriate extension of a study’s methodology beyond what the data or design can reliably support.
It occurs when researchers:
- Make claims that exceed the limitations of the study design (e.g., causal claims from observational data).
- Apply complex statistical or machine learning tools without adequate justification or validation.
- Generalize findings to populations or clinical settings not represented in the data.
- Use sophisticated methods (e.g., SHAP, deep learning) to add perceived value without improving scientific rigor.
Examples in clinical research
- Using a cross-sectional dataset to build a tool for longitudinal prediction.
- Claiming preventive or therapeutic impact from an observational model.
- Presenting model performance metrics (like AUC) as proof of clinical utility.
Consequences
- Misleading conclusions
- False sense of confidence in tools or interventions
- Poor translation into real-world clinical practice
'In summary:
' methodological overreach undermines scientific integrity by overstating what a study can truly demonstrate.