Enhanced recovery after cervical spine surgery

see Enhanced recovery after cervical laminoplasty.

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathways are associated with improved outcomes, lower morbidity and complications, and higher patient satisfaction in multiple surgical subspecialties. Despite these gains, there are few data to guide the application of ERAS concepts to spine surgery.

Elsarrag et al., conducted a systematic review of the PubMed and MEDLINE databases up to November 20, 2018.

Twenty full-text articles were included in the qualitative analysis. The majority of studies were retrospective reviews of nonrandomized data sets or qualitative investigations lacking formal control groups; there was 1 protocol for a future randomized controlled trial. Most studies demonstrated reduced lengths of stay and no increase in rates of readmissions or complications after introduction of an ERAS pathway.

These introductory studies demonstrate the potential of ERAS protocols, when applied to spine procedures, to reduce lengths of stay, accelerate return of function, minimize postoperative pain, and save costs ¹⁾.

The introduction of the ERAS approach at Debono et al., institution for spinal fusion for three studied conditions resulted in a significant decrease in LOS without causing increased postoperative complications. Patient satisfaction with overall management, upstream organization of hospitalization, and the use of e-health was high. According to the study results, which are consistent with those in other studies, the whole concept of ERAS (primarily reducing complications and pain, and then reducing LOS) seems applicable to spinal surgery ²⁾.

Soffin et al., report the development and implementation of the first ERAS pathway for patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) and cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA).

This was a retrospective cohort study of prospectively collected data. The authors created a multidisciplinary pathway based on best available evidence for interventions that positively influence outcomes after anterior cervical spine surgery. Patients were followed prospectively up to postoperative day 90. Patient data were collected via electronic medical record review and included demographics, comorbidities, baseline and perioperative opioid use, postoperative complications, and hospital length of stay (LOS). ERAS process measures and compliance with pathway elements were also tracked.

Thirty-three patients were cared for under the pathway (n = 25 ACDF; n = 8 CDA). The median LOS was 416 minutes (interquartile range [IQR] 210-1643 minutes). Eight patients required an extended stay-longer than 23 hours. Reasons for extended admission included pain (n = 4), dyspnea (n = 1), hypoxia (n = 1), hypertension (n = 1), and dysphagia (n = 1). The median LOS for the 8 patients who required extended monitoring prior to discharge was 1585 minutes (IQR 1423-1713 minutes). Overall pathway compliance with included process measures was 85.6%. The median number of ERAS process elements delivered to each patient was 18. There was no strong association between LOS and number of ERAS process elements provided (Pearson's r = -0.20). Twelve percent of the cohort was opioid tolerant on the day of surgery. There were no significant differences between total intraoperatively or postanesthesia care unit-administered opioid, or LOS, between opioid-tolerant and opioid-naïve patients. There were no complications requiring readmission.

An ERAS pathway for anterior cervical spine surgery facilitates safe, prompt discharge. The ERAS pathway was associated with minimal complications, and no readmissions within 90 days of surgery. Pain and respiratory compromise were both linked with extended LOS in this cohort. Further prospective studies are needed to confirm the potential benefits of ERAS for anterior cervical spine surgery, including longer-term complications, cost, and functional outcomes ³⁾.

4: Nagoshi N, Tsuji O, Okada E, Fujita N, Yagi M, Tsuji T, Nakamura M, Matsumoto M, Watanabe K. Clinical indicators of surgical outcomes after cervical single open-door laminoplasty assessed by the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire. Spinal Cord. 2019 Feb 21. doi: 10.1038/s41393-019-0258-4. [Epub ahead of print] PubMed PMID: 30792540.

5: Ali ZS, Flanders TM, Ozturk AK, Malhotra NR, Leszinsky L, McShane BJ, Gardiner D, Rupich K, Chen HI, Schuster J, Marcotte PJ, Kallan MJ, Grady MS, Fleisher LA, Welch WC. Enhanced recovery after elective spinal and peripheral nerve surgery: pilot study from a single institution. J Neurosurg Spine. 2019 Jan 25:1-9. doi: 10.3171/2018.9.SPINE18681. [Epub ahead of print] PubMed PMID: 30684933.

6: Li J, Li H, Xv ZK, Wang J, Yu QF, Chen G, Li FC, Ren Y, Chen QX. Enhanced recovery care versus traditional care following laminoplasty: A retrospective case-cohort study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Nov;97(48):e13195. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000013195. PubMed PMID: 30508899; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6283133.

7: Ozawa H, Aizawa T, Tateda S, Hashimoto K, Kanno H, Ishizuka M. Spinal Cord Swelling After Surgery in Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: Relationship With Intramedullary Gd-DTPA Enhancement on MRI. Clin Spine Surg. 2018 Aug;31(7):E363-E367. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000664. PubMed PMID: 29863595.

8: Adogwa O, Lilly DT, Vuong VD, Desai SA, Ouyang B, Khalid S, Khanna R, Bagley CA, Cheng J. Extended Length of Stay in Elderly Patients after Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Is Not Attributable to Baseline Illness Severity or Postoperative Complications. World Neurosurg. 2018 Jul;115:e552-e557. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.04.094. Epub 2018 Apr 22. PubMed PMID: 29689404.

9: Zhou C, Zhang G, Panchal RR, Ren X, Xiang H, Xuexiao M, Chen X, Tongtong G, Hong W, Dixson AD. Unique Complications of Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy and Percutaneous Endoscopic Interlaminar Discectomy. Pain Physician. 2018 Mar;21(2):E105-E112. PubMed PMID: 29565953.

10: Shionoya Y, Sunada K, Shigeno K, Nakada A, Honda M, Nakamura T. Can nerve regeneration on an artificial nerve conduit be enhanced by ethanol-induced cervical sympathetic ganglion block? PLoS One. 2017 Dec 8;12(12):e0189297. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0189297. eCollection 2017. PubMed PMID: 29220373; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5722367.

11: Goganau I, Sandner B, Weidner N, Fouad K, Blesch A. Depolarization and electrical stimulation enhance in vitro and in vivo sensory axon growth after spinal cord injury. Exp Neurol. 2018 Feb;300:247-258. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2017.11.011. Epub 2017 Nov 26. PubMed PMID: 29183676; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5752127.

12: Ulndreaj A, Tzekou A, Mothe AJ, Siddiqui AM, Dragas R, Tator CH, Torlakovic EE, Fehlings MG. Characterization of the Antibody Response after Cervical Spinal Cord Injury. J Neurotrauma. 2017 Mar 15;34(6):1209-1226. doi: 10.1089/neu.2016.4498. Epub 2016 Dec 21. PubMed PMID: 27775474; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5359645.

13: Kim TH, Ha Y, Shin JJ, Cho YE, Lee JH, Cho WH. Signal intensity ratio on magnetic resonance imaging as a prognostic factor in patients with cervical compressive myelopathy. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Sep;95(39):e4649. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000004649. PubMed PMID: 27684796; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5265889.

14: Sandhu MS, Ross HH, Lee KZ, Ormerod BK, Reier PJ, Fuller DD. Intraspinal transplantation of subventricular zone-derived neural progenitor cells improves phrenic motor output after high cervical spinal cord injury. Exp Neurol. 2017 Jan;287(Pt 2):205-215. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2016.06.007. Epub 2016 Jun 11. PubMed PMID: 27302679; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6154390.

15: Madhavan K, Chieng LO, Foong H, Wang MY. Surgical outcomes of elderly patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a meta-analysis of studies reporting on 2868 patients. Neurosurg Focus. 2016 Jun;40(6):E13. doi: 10.3171/2016.3.FOCUS1657. PubMed PMID: 27246483.

16: Xu N, Wei F, Liu X, Jiang L, Cai H, Li Z, Yu M, Wu F, Liu Z. Reconstruction of the Upper Cervical Spine Using a Personalized 3D-Printed Vertebral Body in an Adolescent With Ewing Sarcoma. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016 Jan;41(1):E50-4. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001179. PubMed PMID: 26335676.

17: Wang Y, Gao Z, Zhang Y, Feng SQ, Liu Y, Shields LBE, Zhao YZ, Zhu Q, Gozal D, Shields CB, Cai J. Attenuated Reactive Gliosis and Enhanced Functional Recovery Following Spinal Cord Injury in Null Mutant Mice of Platelet-Activating Factor Receptor. Mol Neurobiol. 2016 Jul;53(5):3448-3461. doi: 10.1007/s12035-015-9263-6. Epub 2015 Jun 18. PubMed PMID: 26084439.

18: Walker CL, Wang X, Bullis C, Liu NK, Lu Q, Fry C, Deng L, Xu XM. Biphasic bisperoxovanadium administration and Schwann cell transplantation for repair after cervical contusive spinal cord injury. Exp Neurol. 2015 Feb;264:163-72. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2014.12.002. Epub 2014 Dec 12. PubMed PMID: 25510318; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4324167.

19: Lee KZ, Huang YJ, Tsai IL. Respiratory motor outputs following unilateral midcervical spinal cord injury in the adult rat. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2014 Feb 15;116(4):395-405. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01001.2013. Epub 2013 Nov 27. PubMed PMID: 24285148.

20: Khaing ZZ, Geissler SA, Jiang S, Milman BD, Aguilar SV, Schmidt CE, Schallert T. Assessing forelimb function after unilateral cervical spinal cord injury: novel forelimb tasks predict lesion severity and recovery. J Neurotrauma. 2012 Feb 10;29(3):488-98. doi: 10.1089/neu.2011.2106. Epub 2012 Jan 16. PubMed PMID: 22022897.

21: Katonis P, Souvatzis X, Tsavalas N, Alpantaki K. Reversal of tetraplegia in a patient with haematogenous cervical epidural abscess. Acta Orthop Belg. 2011 Aug;77(4):543-7. PubMed PMID: 21954768.

22: Kajana S, Goshgarian HG. Systemic administration of rolipram increases medullary and spinal cAMP and activates a latent respiratory motor pathway after high cervical spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med. 2009;32(2):175-82. PubMed PMID: 19569465; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2678289.

23: Bo W, Longyi C, Jian T, Guangfu H, Hailong F, Weidong L, Haibin T. A pyogenic discitis at c3-c4 with associated ventral epidural abscess involving c1-c4 after intradiscal oxygen-ozone chemonucleolysis: a case report. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Apr 15;34(8):E298-304. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318195a87e. PubMed PMID: 19365239.

24: Shah RV, Smith HK, Chung J, Hegazi A, Racz GB. Cervical spinal cord neoplasm in a patient with an implanted cervical spinal cord stimulator: the controversial role of magnetic resonance imaging. Pain Physician. 2004 Apr;7(2):273-8. PubMed PMID: 16868604.

25: Bae H, Nantwi KD, Goshgarian HG. Recovery of respiratory function following C2 hemi and carotid body denervation in adult rats: influence of peripheral adenosine receptors. Exp Neurol. 2005 Jan;191(1):94-103. PubMed PMID: 15589516.

26: Ozawa H, Matsumoto T, Ohashi T, Sato M, Kokubun S. Mechanical properties and function of the spinal pia mater. J Neurosurg Spine. 2004 Jul;1(1):122-7. PubMed PMID: 15291032.

27: Hamasaki T, Noda M, Kamei N, Yamamoto S, Ochi M, Yasunaga Y. Intradural extramedullary mass formation in spinal cord sarcoidosis: case report and literature review. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Oct 15;28(20):E420-3. Review. PubMed PMID: 14560097.

28: Saul TG, Carol M, Ducker TB. Immediate mini-myelography in acute cervical cord injuries. Am Surg. 1982 Sep;48(9):463-8. PubMed PMID: 7125380.