Spine magnetic resonance imaging for Spinal cord tumor diagnosis
Spine magnetic resonance imaging for spinal cord tumor diagnosis is the primary modality. However, its validity has never been vigorously scrutinized in daily routine clinical practice, where MRI tissue diagnosis is usually not a single one but multiple ones with several differential diagnoses. Here, we aimed to assess the validity of MRI in terms of predicting the pathology and location of the tumor in routine clinical settings. We analyzed 820 patients with primary spinal cord tumors, who have a pathological diagnosis and location in the operation record which were confirmed. We modified traditional measures for validity based upon a set of diagnoses instead of a single diagnosis. Sensitivity and specificity and positive and negative predictabilities were evaluated for the tumor location and pathology. For tumor location, 456 were intradural extramedullary; 165 were intramedullary, and 156 were extradural. The overall sensitivity and specificity were over 90.0%. However, the sensitivity became lower when the tumor resided simultaneously in two spaces such as in the intradural-and-extradural or intramedullary-and-extramedullary space (54.6% and 30.0%, respectively). Most common pathology was schwannoma (n = 416), followed by meningioma (114) and ependymoma (87). Sensitivities were 93.3%, 90.4%, and 89.7%, respectively. Specificities were 70.8%, 82.9%, and 76.0%. In rare tumors such as neurofibromas, and diffuse midline gliomas, the sensitivity was much lower (less than 30%). For common locations and pathologies, the validity of MRI is generally acceptable. However, for rare locations and pathologies, MRI diagnosis still needs some improvement 1).
Spinal cord tumors are best identified by conventional MR imaging with contrast. Most intramedullary spinal cord tumors have characteristic MR imaging features that allow an accurate preoperative diagnosis 2)
Diagnosis of a primary spinal cord tumor requires a high index of suspicion based on clinical signs and symptoms, in addition to spine-directed magnetic resonance imaging 3).
MRI is the gold standard for diagnosis and assessment of intramedullary tumors. Nevertheless, sometimes MRI may not accurately differentiate between different types of intramedullary tumors, in particular if they are associated with syringes or intra- and peritumoral cysts. This could subsequently affect surgical strategies. Intraoperative ultrasound (ioUS) has become in the last few years a very useful tool for use during neurosurgical procedures. Various ioUS modalities such as B-mode and Doppler have been applied during neurosurgical procedures. On the other hand, the use of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is not yet well defined and standardized in this field. We report a case of a young patient harboring a cervicothoracic intramedullary tumor, for which the preoperative neuroradiological diagnosis was in favor of a diffuse astrocytoma with nodular components whereas ioUS demonstrated 3 distinct intramedullary nodules. CEUS showed highly vascularized lesions, compatible with hemangioblastomas. These findings, particularly those obtained with CEUS, allowed better definition of the lesions for diagnosis, enhanced understanding of the physiopathological aspects, and permitted the localization of all 3 nodules, thus limiting spinal cord manipulation and allowing complete resection of the lesions, with an uneventful postoperative neurological course. This is the first report of the use of intraoperative CEUS in a case of intramedullary hemangioblastoma 4).
