Quality Assessment

Domain Risk of Bias
Randomization process (Low / Some concerns / High)
Deviations from intended interventions (Low / Some concerns / High)
Missing outcome data (Low / Some concerns / High)
Measurement of the outcome (Low / Some concerns / High)
Selection of the reported result (Low / Some concerns / High)
Overall Judgment (Low / Some concerns / High)
Item Score (0-2) Comments
A clearly stated aim
Inclusion of consecutive patients
Prospective data collection
Endpoints appropriate to the aim of the study
Unbiased assessment of the study endpoint
Follow-up period appropriate to the aim of the study
Loss to follow-up less than 5%
Prospective calculation of the study size
Control group (only for comparative studies)
Baseline equivalence of groups (only for comparative studies)
Adequate statistical analyses (only for comparative studies)
Adequate follow-up of control group (only for comparative studies)
Total Score
  • 0 = Not reported
  • 1 = Reported but inadequate
  • 2 = Reported and adequate
  • quality_assessment.txt
  • Last modified: 2025/04/27 12:00
  • (external edit)