Movement Disorder Treatment

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery for the treatment of movement disorders usually employs stimulation at a single site in one or both hemispheres. However, research has demonstrated that multi-target DBS shows some benefits over single target DBS 1) 2) 3).

The first surgical procedures for abnormal movement disorders began in the 1930s, when surgeons first proposed ablative techniques of the caudate nucleus or transection of motor (pyramidal) pathways to reduce involuntary movements in patients with Parkinson's related tremor. During the 50-year interval between 1945 and 1995, the development of precise intracranial guiding devices, brain maps, and advanced imaging led to the refinement of appropriate deep brain targets affecting extrapyramidal pathways. Lesional surgery and subsequent neuroaugmentation using deep brain stimulation extended the role of deep brain surgery for a wider group of patients with tremor, rigidity, dyskinesia, and other involuntary movement disorders. Stereotactic radiosurgery has had wide application for tremor. The history of movement disorder surgery reads like a who's who of brilliant and resourceful surgeons who pushed the frontiers of neurosurgery. Even today, practitioners of functional brain surgery are among the most innovative practicing neurosurgeons 4).

Walker et al., reviewed 384 electrode implants for movement disorders, characterized the presence or absence of stimulus amplitude thresholds for dose-limiting DBS side effects during surgery, and measured their predictive value for side effects during device activation in clinic with odds ratios ±95% confidence intervals. They also estimated associations between voltage thresholds for side effects within participants. Intraoperative clinical response to macrostimulation led to adjustments in DBS electrode position during surgery in 37.5% of cases (31.0% adjustment of lead depth, 18.2% new trajectory, or 11.7% both). Within and across targets and disease states, dose-limiting stimulation side effects from the final electrode position in surgery predict postoperative side effects, and side effect thresholds in clinic occur at lower stimulus amplitudes versus those encountered in surgery. In conclusion, awake clinical testing during DBS targeting impacts surgical decision-making and predicts dose-limiting side effects during subsequent device activation 5).


1)
Oropilla JQL, Diesta CCE, Itthimathin P, Suchowersky O, Kiss ZHT: Both thalamic and pallidal deep brain stimulation for myoclonic dystonia. J Neurosurg 112:1267–1270, 2010
2)
Stefani A, Peppe A, Pierantozzi M, Galati S, Moschella V, Stanzione P, et al: Multi-target strategy for Parkinsonian patients: the role of deep brain stimulation in the centromedianparafascicularis complex. Brain Res Bull 78:113–118, 2009
3)
Stover NP, Okun MS, Evatt ML, Raju DV, Bakay RAE, Vitek JL: Stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus in a patient with Parkinson's disease and essential tremor. Arch Neurol 62:141–143, 2005
4)
Lunsford LD, Niranjan A. The History of Movement Disorder Brain Surgery. Prog Neurol Surg. 2018;33:1-12. doi: 10.1159/000480717. Epub 2018 Jan 12. PubMed PMID: 29332069.
5)
Walker HC, Faulk J, Rahman AF, Gonzalez CL, Roush P, Nakhmani A, Crowell JL, Guthrie BL. Awake Testing during Deep Brain Stimulation Surgery Predicts Postoperative Stimulation Side Effect Thresholds. Brain Sci. 2019 Feb 18;9(2). pii: E44. doi: 10.3390/brainsci9020044. PubMed PMID: 30781641.
  • movement_disorder_treatment.txt
  • Last modified: 2024/06/07 02:52
  • by 127.0.0.1