Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
📊 Metrics & Standing
- Impact Factor (JCR 2023): ~3.3–3.6
- SCImago Journal Rank (SJR 2024): 1.248 (Q1 in Radiology/Nuclear Medicine)
- h-index: 189
- CiteScore (Scopus 2024): ~8.7
- Acceptance Rate: ~35%
- Review Speed: ~2 months from submission to first decision
Interpretation: JMRI is a well‑established, reputable journal within its domain. Its Q1 ranking and strong h‑index indicate relevance and sustained academic influence, especially for clinical and diagnostic MRI studies.
✅ Strengths
- Strong Clinical Relevance:
Focuses on diagnostic and clinical MRI applications, highly valuable for radiologists and translational researchers.
- Solid Citation Performance:
Stable mid–3 range IF and high h-index denote consistent citation and academic use.
- Efficient Publication Process:
~2-month review time and moderate acceptance rate ensure both selectivity and timely dissemination.
- Societal Endorsement:
Official journal of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine (ISMRM), published by Wiley.
⚠️ Limitations & Criticisms
- Recent IF Decline:
Decrease from ~4.5 (2021) to ~3.3 (2023) possibly due to increasing competition and shifts in citation dynamics.
- Narrow Citation Pool:
Clinical diagnostic focus may reduce crossover with methodological or theoretical MRI communities.
- Impact Reliance on Flagship Papers:
Annual citation metrics can be skewed by a few highly cited studies.
- Metric Limitations:
IF and similar indices have inherent flaws and should not be used as sole quality indicators.
🔄 Comparison with Similar Journals
| Journal | Impact Factor | SJR/Q | h-index | Scope Emphasis |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JMRI (Wiley) | ~3.3–3.6 | 1.248 / Q1 | 189 | Clinical diagnostic MRI |
| Magnetic Resonance in Medicine | ~4.7 | – | – | Imaging physics & techniques |
| IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging | ~9.8 | – | – | Algorithmic/technical development |
| Magnetic Resonance Imaging (Elsevier) | ~2.5 | – | – | Broader imaging biology |
🧭 Overall Evaluation
- Best suited for: Clinical/translational MRI, validation studies, diagnostic performance.
- Less ideal for: Advanced physics, image reconstruction, or AI algorithm development.
- Note: Declining IF does not imply reduced quality. Consider scope, audience, and fit.
📝 Recommendations
- Ideal for authors in clinical radiology or neurology fields using MRI.
- Consider other venues (e.g. IEEE TMI) for more technical or computational work.
- Use metrics with caution and prioritize scope alignment and visibility.
Bottom line: *JMRI remains a reputable, Q1-ranked journal with a strong clinical focus and societal endorsement. It ensures reliable visibility and rigorous standards for clinical imaging research.*