This is an old revision of the document!


Frontiers in Neurology

✅ Strengths and Merits

  • Open-access and Highly Cited
    • One of the most cited open-access journals in Clinical Neurology. According to 2017 JCR data, it ranked first in total citations.
  • Broad Indexing and Transparent Policies
    • Indexed in PubMed Central, Scopus, DOAJ, and Web of Science.
    • Member of COPE and OASPA.
    • Publishes peer review reports and discloses reviewer identities after publication.
  • Fast Turnaround Time
    • Average time from submission to acceptance is ~90 days.
    • Uses an interactive peer-review system to streamline revisions.

⚠️ Criticisms and Concerns

  • Perception of Superficial Peer Review
    • Reports of reviewers missing key points or submitting superficial assessments.
    • Authors and reviewers note pressure to avoid rejecting submissions.
  • Controversies Over Editorial Practices
    • Listed by Beall’s list (2015) as a potentially predatory publisher (now removed).
    • Internal disputes and retractions have occurred in some Frontiers journals.
    • Allegations that the publisher prioritizes profit and special issue volume over quality control.
  • Mixed Reputation in Academia
    • Some academic institutions may consider it a second-tier journal.
    • Concerns exist about the academic rigor of certain article types and special topics.

📊 Journal Metrics Snapshot

  • Impact Factor: ~3.5–5
  • CiteScore: ~3.3–4.6
  • SJR: Q2 in Neurology
  • Review time: ~90 days
  • Indexed in: PubMed, PMC, Scopus, WoS

🧭 Submission Suitability

  • Recommended for:
    • Broad dissemination of clinically relevant or incremental findings.
    • Authors needing fast open-access publication.
  • Use caution when:
    • Publishing novel, high-impact, or methodologically complex work.
    • Relying on peer-review rigor for academic validation or tenure.

📝 Conclusion

*Frontiers in Neurology* offers fast, open-access publication with wide visibility. However, concerns about peer review depth and editorial standards warrant careful consideration—especially for high-stakes research.

Bottom line: Suitable for routine or timely studies. For seminal work, consider society journals with more stringent editorial boards.

  • frontiers_in_neurology.1751385597.txt.gz
  • Last modified: 2025/07/01 15:59
  • by administrador