external_ventricular_drainage_in_intraventricular_hemorrhage

External Ventricular Drainage in Intraventricular Hemorrhage

External ventricular drainage (EVD) is a core neurosurgical technique in the acute management of intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH), especially when associated with hydrocephalus or elevated intracranial pressure (ICP).

EVD is used to:

  1. Position patient supine, head elevated 20–30°
  2. Identify Kocher’s point: 2.5 cm lateral to midline, 1 cm anterior to coronal suture
  3. Drill burr hole, open dura
  4. Advance catheter ~5–6 cm toward foramen of Monro
  5. Confirm bloody CSF return
  6. Connect to drainage system, level at 10–15 cmH₂O above tragus
  7. Monitor ICP and drainage
  8. *Optional*: instill thrombolytics (per protocol)
  • The CLEAR III trial (NEJM 2016):
    1. Alteplase via EVD reduced clot burden and mortality
    2. No statistically significant improvement in functional outcome (mRS ≤ 3)
  • EVD alone remains standard for hydrocephalus relief, not for clot resolution
  • Infection (5–20%)
  • Obstruction due to blood clots
  • Overdrainage → subdural collections
  • Catheter tract hemorrhage
  • Endoscopic IVH evacuation (limited to specialized centers)
  • Intraventricular thrombolysis (investigational)
  • Lumbar drainage if no obstructive component (not in IVH)
  • Always monitor neurologic exam and ICP trends
  • Avoid excessive CSF drainage
  • Reassess EVD need daily
  • Use strict sterile technique for CSF sampling

See also:

In a Letter to the Editor Leite et al. in the *Journal of Neurosurgery* comment on current practices and considerations regarding external ventricular drainage in intraventricular hemorrhage. The authors present their viewpoint on optimal EVD timing, placement technique, cerebrospinal fluid management strategies, and potential complications 1).

* Strengths:

  • Raises important technical and clinical considerations not addressed in existing guidelines.
  • Encourages neurosurgeons to think critically about EVD protocols within IVH management.

* Weaknesses:

  • No original data or case series—purely anecdotal/opinion-based.
  • Lacks explicit descriptions of technique or outcomes that could inform practice.
  • Limited generalizability due to absence of evidence backing suggestions.

* Verdict:

  • Opinion letters can spark discussion, but without empirical data, this piece remains speculative.
  • Useful as a catalyst for more rigorous study, but should not alter clinical practice alone.

* Rating: 4 / 10

  • Points awarded for raising procedural nuances; significant deductions for absence of data.

* Key takeaway for practicing neurosurgeons:

  • While the authors emphasize several technical considerations, it remains essential to rely on high‑quality evidence and institutional protocols when using EVD in IVH. This letter may prompt re‑evaluation of local practices, but should not replace data‑driven protocols.

An anecdotal commentary on EVD use in IVH—thought‑provoking but unsubstantiated. Use as a discussion starter, not as a guideline.

Citation: Leite PI, Rabello PH, Figueiredo EG. Letter to the Editor: A viewpoint on external ventricular drainage in intraventricular hemorrhage. *J Neurosurg.* 2025 Jul 4:1–2. doi:10.3171/2025.3.JNS25426.

Categories: neurosurgery_letters, ivh_management, csf_diversion Tags: intraventricular hemorrhage, external ventricular drainage, EVD technique, opinion piece, commentary


1)
Leite PIF, Rabello PHM, Figueiredo EG. Letter to the Editor. A viewpoint on external ventricular drainage in intraventricular hemorrhage. J Neurosurg. 2025 Jul 4:1-2. doi: 10.3171/2025.3.JNS25426. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 40614284.
  • external_ventricular_drainage_in_intraventricular_hemorrhage.txt
  • Last modified: 2025/07/05 09:06
  • by administrador