Craniofacial fracture classification

• Spontaneous Resolution of an Aggressive Direct Carotid Cavernous Fistula Following Partial Transvenous Embolization Treatment: A Case Report and Review of Literatures
• A retrospective study of the injury patterns seen in fatal falls downstairs
• Risk Factors for Hardware Removal Following Bimaxillary Surgery: A National Database Analysis
• Frontal Sinus Fractures: An Evaluation of Patient Demographics, Mechanisms of Injury, Classification, and Management Strategies in Patients Referred to a Trauma Center, From 2014 to 2019
• Development and Standardization of a Classification System for Osteoradionecrosis: Implementation of a Risk-Based Model
• Risk Factors for Acute Postoperative Complications Following Operative Management of Le Fort Fractures-A NSQIP Study
• A Nationwide Analysis of Gunshot Wounds of the Head and Neck: Morbidity, Mortality, and Cost
• Approaching patients with panfacial fractures by using an anatomical reference: A novel concept and preliminary study

see LeFort fracture

All complex craniofacial fractures are craniofacial fractures, not all craniofacial fractures are necessarily complex. The term “complex” is used to emphasize the intricate and challenging nature of certain fractures that may require specialized expertise and a comprehensive treatment approach. The severity, specific bones involved, and associated complications play a role in determining whether a craniofacial fracture is classified as complex.

Craniofacial fractures can be classified based on various factors, including the specific bones involved, the location of the fractures, and the complexity of the injury. The classification systems aim to provide a standardized way to describe and categorize these fractures for better communication among healthcare professionals and to guide treatment decisions. Several classification systems exist, and the choice of classification may depend on the specific context and the preferences of the medical team. Here are a few commonly used classification systems for craniofacial fractures:

Le Fort Classification:

Le Fort I: Horizontal fracture that involves the maxilla above the level of the teeth. Le Fort II: Pyramidal fracture that extends from the nasal bones, through the maxilla, to the orbit and across the midface. Le Fort III: Craniofacial disjunction with fractures involving the zygoma, maxilla, and orbits, causing separation of the facial skeleton from the cranial base. Zones of the Face:

Zone I: Central facial area involving the nose and upper lip. Zone II: Maxillary area including the infraorbital rims and zygoma. Zone III: Mandibular area, including the lower lip and jaw. AO/ASIF Classification:

The AO/ASIF (Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen/Association for the Study of Internal Fixation) system classifies fractures based on the anatomic location and type of fracture pattern. Panfacial Fracture Classification:

This classification considers fractures involving all three parts of the face: upper, middle, and lower face. Mandible Fracture Classification:

Classifies fractures based on the location of the mandibular fracture (e.g., condylar, body, angle, symphysis). It's important to note that these are general classification systems, and specific cases may require a more detailed and individualized assessment. The management of craniofacial fractures often involves a multidisciplinary team, including oral and maxillofacial surgeons, plastic surgeons, neurosurgeons, and ophthalmologists, among others.

Complex Craniofacial Fracture.

Nasoorbitoethmoid fracture.

Fronto-ethmoid-naso-orbital depressed skull fracture

Frontal Sinus Fracture