COPERNIC RC - Venous Remodeling Balloon
Innovation, made to measure www.balt.fr Balt Extrusion continues to manufacture its entire portfolio in Europe.
10, rue de la Croix Vigneron Tél. : +33 (0)1 39 89 46 41
🧠 Indication
The Venous Remodeling Technique in the treatment of dural arteriovenous fistulas (dAVFs) was developed by Pr. René Chapot (Alfried Krupp Krankenhaus, Essen, Germany). This technique aims to preserve the venous sinus during embolization of meningeal feeders.
🎯 Purpose
* Occlusion of sinus with the balloon’s long length * Rerouting of embolic agents by temporary occlusion * Controlled procedure with high visibility * DMSO compatible
💡 Background
Initially, angioplasty PTA balloons were used, but they lacked navigability and compliance.
To overcome this, BALT developed a dedicated venous remodeling balloon — the COPERNIC RC, designed for better flexibility, length, and ease of use.
🧪 Technical Features
Reference | Balloon length (mm) | Balloon diameter (mm) | Catheter length (cm) | Max. outer diameter (F / mm) | Guidewire compatibility | Compatible guiding catheter |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COPERNIC8X80RC | 8 | 8 | 160 | 4.35F / 1.45 mm | Transend14 (Stryker\*) | FARGO MAX 6F (I.D. 1.78 mm / .070“) |
COPERNIC10X80RC | 10 | 10 | 160 | 5F / 1.6 mm | Transend14 (Stryker\*) | FARGO MAX 6F |
* \* Other guidewires may induce risk of leakage.
🚀 Navigation Features
* HYDROSPEED coating on the balloon for easy navigation * Introduction via femoral venous puncture * Navigated to sinus with 6F guiding catheter (FARGOMAX) * Arterial approach for embolic agent injection * Balloon inflation diverts flow toward remaining feeders
📌 Summary
The COPERNIC RC balloon is specifically designed for sinus protection during embolization of dural AVFs, providing:
- Flexibility
- High compliance
- Length suitable for sinus occlusion
- Visibility and navigation ease
- Compatibility with standard neurointerventional equipment
Source: BALT Extrusion – balt.fr Product code: DC027GB–2013/12
Case reports
In a Video technique demonstration / Case report Noda et al. from:
- Neuroradiologie Interventionelle, CHU Limoges, Limoges, France
- Neurosurgery, NTT Medical Center Tokyo, Shinagawa‑ku, Japan
- Radiology Department, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Fakulti Perubatan, Cheras, Malaysia
- Published in the Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery
with the purpose to demonstrate feasibility and safety of using a large compliant balloon positioned in a cortical vein to support microcatheter navigation for transvenous embolization of a brain AVM They concluded that the large compliant Copernic RC balloon provided stable “buttress” support in a cortical draining vein, enabling safe and successful microcatheter cannulation during TVE in a challenging bAVM case, without complications 1).
This video-based single‑case technique report suffers from severe limitations:
- n=1 restricts external validity—no statistical support or comparison with standard microcatheter techniques
- No quantitative bench testing or phantom models to define force thresholds, risks of venous rupture, or balloon‑catheter interaction
- Balloon in cortical veins raises significant safety concerns: potential for endothelial injury, venous thrombosis, or rupture—no monitoring or follow‑up imaging provided
- Technique complexity—introducing a compliant balloon into fragile veins may add procedural risk not fully acknowledged
- No long‑term clinical outcomes documented; absence of angiographic follow‑up to confirm AVM obliteration or highlight delayed venous injury undermines claims
- Lack of multi-operator reproducibility or ergonomic feasibility—unclear learning curve or required expertise
Final Verdict
This contribution is a rudimentary proof‑of‑concept overshadowed by major safety, validity, and reproducibility concerns. Valuable as an exploratory video, but not robust evidence.
Takeaway for Neurosurgeons
A novel balloon-assisted approach shows technical promise in select TVE scenarios—but red flags abound: extremely cautious use, rigorous safety protocols, and comparative studies are mandatory before adoption.
Bottom Line
One-case video demonstration only; attractive in concept but currently lacks scientific rigour and safety validation—far from practice-changing.
Numeric Rating (0–10)
2/10 – Innovative idea, but unjustified risk and devoid of follow‑up or comparative evidence.
Citation
- Published online ahead of print June 24, 2025.
- Corresponding author email: izzatarslan@gmail.com