Consensus methodology refers to structured approaches used to achieve agreement among a group of experts or stakeholders, particularly when empirical data is incomplete or expert opinions diverge.

1. Delphi Method

  • Process: Iterative rounds of anonymous questionnaires among experts. Feedback is shared between rounds.
  • Goal: Converge toward consensus.
  • Applications: Health guidelines, forecasting, policy development.
  • Advantages: Anonymity reduces bias; allows remote participation.
  • Limitations: Time-consuming; risk of participant drop-off.

2. Nominal Group Technique (NGT)

  • Process: Structured in-person session. Ideas are generated silently, then shared and ranked.
  • Goal: Rapid prioritization through voting.
  • Applications: Needs assessment, guideline creation.
  • Advantages: Promotes equal participation; fast.
  • Limitations: Requires physical presence; no anonymity.

3. RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method (RAM)

  • Process: Combines Delphi with systematic literature review. Experts rate clinical scenarios in two rounds.
  • Goal: Assess appropriateness of interventions.
  • Applications: Clinical decision-making tools.
  • Advantages: Evidence-informed; highly structured.
  • Limitations: Resource and time-intensive.

4. Consensus Conference

  • Process: Public or expert panel discusses and issues a joint consensus statement.
  • Goal: Incorporate diverse perspectives.
  • Applications: Ethical issues, public health, biotechnology.
  • Advantages: Democratic, transparent.
  • Limitations: Complex logistics; unpredictable outcomes.

5. Modified Delphi / e-Delphi

  • Process: Online version of Delphi; often with fewer rounds.
  • Goal: Speed up consensus while maintaining rigor.
  • Applications: Virtual expert panels, core outcome sets.
  • Advantages: Efficient and accessible.
  • Limitations: May lack depth or iterative refinement.
  • Evidence is limited or conflicting
  • Expert opinion is needed to guide practice
  • Developing:
    1. Clinical practice guidelines
    2. Core outcome sets
    3. Ethical or policy frameworks
  • CREDES – for Delphi methodology
  • COS-STAD – for developing Core Outcome Sets
  • AGREE II – for guideline reporting quality

Feel free to adapt for specific projects (e.g. cranioplasty outcome sets or neurosurgical guidelines).

  • consensus_methodology.txt
  • Last modified: 2025/07/01 17:47
  • by administrador