Cerebrospinal fluid analysis for Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease Diagnosis
Cerebrospinal fluid 14-3-3 protein detection remains an important test in the Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease Diagnosis. Due to a loss in specificity in acute neurological events, the interpretation of positive 14-3-3 results needs to be performed in the clinical context.
a) routine labs: usually normal, although protein may occasionally be elevated
b) abnormal proteins:
● abnormal proteins (designated 130 & 131) have been identified in the CSF of patients with Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease, 1) but the assay is technically difficult and is therefore not practical for routine clinical use
● proteins 130/131 were identified as the normal neuronal protein 14–3-3, and a relatively simple immunoassay for this was developed for use on as little as 50 mcl of CSF 2)
Detection of the 14–3-3 protein in the CSF has 96% sensitivity and specificity for CJD among patients with dementia. False positives may occur in other conditions involving extensive neuronal destruction including acute stroke, herpes encephalitis, multi-infarct dementia, primary CNS lymphoma, and rarely SDAT (most cases of SDAT test negative). Requires CSF (cannot be done on blood).
CSF was tested for 14-3-3, Tau, NSE, and S100b in 1,859 patients with sporadic, genetic, iatrogenic, and variant CJD, and in 1,117 controls.
Results: The highest sensitivity was achieved for 14-3-3 and Tau in sporadic CJD (85% and 86%), and a combined determination of 14-3-3 and Tau, S100b, or NSE increased the sensitivity to over 93%. Multivariate analysis showed that the sensitivity of all tests was highest in patients with the shortest disease duration, age at onset >40 years, and homozygosity at codon 129 of the prion protein gene. In a group of patients with repeated lumbar punctures, a second test also increased the diagnostic sensitivity.
Conclusions: The detection of elevated levels of brain-derived proteins in the CSF in patients with suspected Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease is a valuable diagnostic test. A second lumbar puncture may be of value in patients with atypical clinical course in whom the first test was negative 3).