🧠 Causal Language
Causal language refers to wording that suggests a cause-and-effect relationship between two variables.
🔍 Definition
Causal language is used when an author implies that one factor directly causes another — rather than merely being associated or correlated — even if the study design does not support such inference.
Examples:
- ❌ “Treatment leads to improved survival”
- ❌ “Dose escalation prevents local failure”
Correct alternatives:
- ✅ “Treatment was associated with improved survival”
- ✅ “Higher dose correlated with lower failure rates”
⚠️ Why It’s Problematic
Using causal language in:
- Retrospective studies
- Observational studies without causal inference methods
… can:
- Overstate conclusions
- Mislead clinicians or policymakers
- Hide potential confounding factors or biases
🧪 Only Appropriate In:
- Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs)
- Studies using robust causal inference tools:
- Propensity score matching
- Instrumental variable analysis
- Directed acyclic graphs (DAGs)
If a study does not randomize exposure and lacks causal modeling, causal language should be avoided.