brainstem_cavernous_malformation_surgery_timing

Brainstem cavernous malformation surgery timing

Considering surgical timing, anywhere between 4 and 6 weeks or the subacute phase of the hemorrhage is considered appropriate. The aims of surgical intervention must be to improve preoperative function, minimize surgical morbidity and to reduce hemorrhagic rates 1).


Although BSCM surgery is associated with significant perioperative morbidity and mortality, favorable long-term hemorrhage rates and symptom resolution can be achieved in a carefully selected group of patients. Overall, patients treated acutely, within 6 weeks, benefited the most from surgical intervention 2)


In agreement with other authors 3) 4) Sandalcioglu et al. performed surgery in the subacute stage with a delay of several days or weeks after the haemorrhage, when the patient is in a stable condition. Additionally, in the subacute stage MR imaging allows better differentiation between the haematoma and the vascular malformation itself. Knowing the exact location of the cavernous malformation within the bleeding cavity is valuable for planning the surgical approach 5).


The timing of the Brainstem cavernous malformation surgery should consider the symptoms, and nuclear signs, as well as the presence of acute symptoms 6) 7) 8) 9) 10) 11) 12) 13) 14) 15).

Extension and volume of hematoma are factors that should be considered before a surgery is indicated 16).

If applied in a multidisciplinary neurosurgical center, microsurgery and radiosurgery are complementary treatment options that both result in reduced bleeding rates and improvement of clinical outcome 17).


1)
Rajagopal N, Kawase T, Mohammad AA, Seng LB, Yamada Y, Kato Y. Timing of Surgery and Surgical Strategies in Symptomatic Brainstem Cavernomas: Review of the Literature. Asian J Neurosurg. 2019 Jan-Mar;14(1):15-27. doi: 10.4103/ajns.AJNS_158_18. PMID: 30937003; PMCID: PMC6417313.
2)
Zaidi HA, Mooney MA, Levitt MR, Dru AB, Abla AA, Spetzler RF. Impact of Timing of Intervention Among 397 Consecutively Treated Brainstem Cavernous Malformations. Neurosurgery. 2017 Oct 1;81(4):620-626. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyw139. PMID: 28184444.
3)
Bertalanffy H, Gilsbach JM, Eggert HR, et al. Microsurgery of deep-seated cavernous angiomas: report of 26 cases. Acta Neurochir (Wien)1991;108:91–9.
4)
Fahlbusch R, Strauss C, Huk W, et al. Surgical removal of pontomesencephalic cavernous hemangiomas. Neurosurgery1990;26:449–57.
5)
Sandalcioglu IE, Wiedemayer H, Secer S, Asgari S, Stolke D. Surgical removal of brain stem cavernous malformations: surgical indications, technical considerations, and results. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2002 Mar;72(3):351-5. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.72.3.351. PMID: 11861694; PMCID: PMC1737795.
6)
Kupersmith MJ, Kalish H, Epstein F, Yu G, Berenstein A, Woo H, et al. Natural history of brainstem cavernous malformations. Neurosurgery. 2001;48(1):47-53; discussion 53-4.
7)
Moriarity JL, Wetzeu M, Clatterbuck, Avedan S, Sheppard JM, Hoenig-Rigamonti K, et al. The natural history of cavernous malformations: a prospective study of 68 patients. Neurosurgery. 1999;44(6):1166-71; discussion 1172-3.
8)
Moran NF, Fish DR, Kitchen Shorvon S, Kendall BE, Stevens F. Supratentorial cavernous haemangiomas and epilepsy: a review of the literature and case series. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1999;66(5):561-8.
9)
Ziyal IM, Sekhar LN, Salas E, Sen C. Surgical management of cavernous malformations of the brain stem. Br J Neurosurg. 1999;13(4):366-75.
10)
Bricolo A. Surgical management of intrinsic brain stem gliomas. Oper Tech Neurosurg. 2000;3(2):137-54.
11)
Sakai N, Yamada H, Tanigawara T, Asano Y, Andoh T, Tanabe Y, et al. Surgical treatment of cavernous angioma involving the brainstem. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1991;113(3-4):138-43.
12)
Bouillot P, Dufour H, Roche PH, Lena G, Graziani N, Grisoli F. [Angiographically occult vascular malformations of the brain stem. A propos of 25 cases]. Neurochirurgie. 1996;42(4-5):189-20; discussion 200-1. Article in French.
13)
Steinberg GK, Chang SD, Gewirtz RJ, Lopes JR. Microsurgical resection of brainstem, thalamic and basal ganglia angiographically occult vascular malformations. Neurosurgery. 2000;46(2):260-70; discussion 270-1.
14)
Cantore G, Missori G, Santoro A. Cavernous angiomas of the brain stem. Intra-axial anatomical pitfalls and surgical strategies. Surg Neurol. 1999;52(1):84-93; discussion 93-4.
15)
Kikuta K, Nozaki K, Takahashi JA, Miyamoto S, Kikuchi H, Hashimoto N. Postoperative evaluation of microsurgical resection for cavernous malformations of the brainstem. J Neurosurg. 2004;101(4):607-12.
16)
de Aguiar PH, Zicarelli CA, Isolan G, Antunes A, Aires R, Georgeto SM, Tahara A, Haddad F. Brainstem cavernomas: a surgical challenge. Einstein (Sao Paulo). 2012 Jan-Mar;10(1):67-73. PubMed PMID: 23045829.
17)
Frischer JM, Gatterbauer B, Holzer S, Stavrou I, Gruber A, Novak K, Wang WT, Reinprecht A, Mert A, Trattnig S, Mallouhi A, Kitz K, Knosp E. Microsurgery and radiosurgery for brainstem cavernomas: effective and complementary treatment options. World Neurosurg. 2014 Mar-Apr;81(3-4):520-8. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2014.01.004. Epub 2014 Jan 16. PubMed PMID: 24440458.
  • brainstem_cavernous_malformation_surgery_timing.txt
  • Last modified: 2024/06/07 02:57
  • by 127.0.0.1