With its inception nearly half a century ago through the pioneering work of Walter Edward Dandy, McLean, and Smith, anterior skull base (ASB) surgery is a relatively young discipline. It became a distinct entity in 1963 when Ketcham popularized the combined transcranial transfacial approach for en bloc resection of tumors of the paranasal sinuses extending into the anterior cranial fossa. However, because these procedures resulted in major morbidities and mortalities, alternative modes of treatment were sought.

Open microscopic anterior skull base surgery

Endoscopic anterior skull base surgery

Both open, microscopic and transnasal endoscopic approaches have gained considerable attention. Recent data have evaluated the endoscopic anatomy of the skull base, defined surgical corridors, addressed anatomical limitations to endoscopic skull base surgery, and discussed the limitations of skull base reconstruction. Over the same period of time, new surgical transcranial approaches have challenged the traditional operative corridors to the anterior skull base.

The data provide support for both open and endoscopic approaches to the anterior cranial base 1).

Endoscopic surgery is more cost-effective than open procedures because it reduces duration of hospitalisation, operating time and theatre consumables and obviates the need for postoperative intensive care unit admission 2).

The basic principle of anterior skull base surgery is to provide adequate exposure to enable three dimensional resection of skull base tumors. Negative surgical margins, which is within the control of surgeon, is the principle prognostic factor in anterior skull base tumors. Open skull base approaches is the standard of care for malignant anterior skull base tumors. Benign lesions may be resected by alternate minimally invasive approaches. Advances in anterior skull base surgery, in particular the facial translocation approaches allows wide exposure of the tumors with minimal retraction of the brain 3)

Drilling of the clinoid process and tuberculum sella, and optic canal unroofing are important surgical techniques, which may be performed relatively safely by a skilled neurosurgeon 4).

Minimally invasive accesses to the anterior skull base include the endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) and the supraorbital eyebrow approach. These 2 are often seen as competing approaches, not alternative or combinatory approaches. In this study, we evaluated the anatomic limitations of each approach and the combined approach for accessing the anterior skull base.

METHODS: Ten neurovascular injected cadaver heads were used for the study. The supraorbital approach to the anterior skull base was performed on 5 heads, and EEA was done on the other 5 heads. Then, the supraorbital approach was added to the 5 heads receiving EEA. Visualization and surgical limitations were recorded by the ability to perform resection of the crista galli, anterior clinoid, cribriform plate, and planum sellae.

RESULTS: The maximal lateral extension of EEA for anterior skull base was the midorbit line anteriorly but narrowing down toward the orbital apex. The limitation of the supraorbital approach was found mostly medial and anterior. Drilling of anterior skull base was impossible medially between the sphenoethmoidal suture and the posterior aspect of the crista galli. The combined approach showed complementary areas of visualization and surgical maneuverability. Three clinical cases were presented to illustrate the indications for the stand-alone supraorbital approach, EEA, and combined approach.

CONCLUSION: The limitations of the EEA when dealing with lateral extension of anterior skull base meningiomas, and the limitations of the supraorbital eyebrow approach for medial skull base drilling and reconstruction, can be overcome by a judicious, anatomically based combination of both approaches 5).

Lumbar drain placement

Routine placement of perioperative lumbar drain may be associated with an increased risk of tension pneumocephalus and intracranial complications during surgery of the anterior cranial base 6).

A retrospective review of 93 patients who underwent LD placement at a institution between 2006 and 2011. Of these patients, 43 underwent elective LD placement prior to ASB surgery; 2 patients had evidence of CSF rhinorrhea prior to surgery, and 41 had no evidence of a preoperative CSF leak. Of those 41 patients, 2 developed CSF rhinorrhea (2/41= 4.9%) as a result of surgery-all in endoscopic patient population (N = 21; 2/21= 9.5%). No postoperative CSF leaks were noted in the ASB surgery cohort (N = 20). Other complications were rare, but we encountered two instances of delayed malignant cerebral edema in the open ASB cohort. Overall, preoperative LD placement was found to be an effective means of preventing postoperative CSF leaks after ASB approaches, but potential and significant intracranial complications may occur in select patients that merit careful consideration prior to LD placement 7).

The outcome of anterior skull base tumors have steadily increased over the years with disease free survival comparable to other malignant neoplasm of the head and neck region.

Between 1973 and 2005, 234 patients underwent anterior skull base surgery at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center. Of these, 19 patients were <21 years of age. Survival outcomes were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared with patients >/=21 years old. Nineteen patients <21 years old underwent a total of 20 procedures for lesions of the anterior skull base.

Sarcoma was the most common indication for surgery including 6 (32%) patients treated for radiation-induced malignancies. Minor complications were noted with 6 (30%) procedures. There were no major complications and no perioperative deaths. The difference in 3-year recurrence-free (68% versus 59%; p = 0.623) and overall survival (83% versus 66%; p = 0.309) compared with patients >/=21 years old did not reach statistical significance. Anterior skull base surgery is well tolerated in pediatric and young adult patients <21 years of age. Survival is comparable to older patients treated similarly and appears strongly influenced by histology 8).

The Anterior Skull Base Surgery QOL questionnaire, a disease-specific multidimensional instrument dedicated to this population, was used to collect and prospectively analyze demographic, medical, and QOL data on 48 patients. Thirty-nine patients completed the questionnaire preoperatively and at 6 and 12 months postoperatively. Seventeen patients (44%) had malignant histology and 22 (56%) had benign tumors. The overall QOL score decreased significantly at 6 months postoperatively (p < 0.05) and improved significantly at 12 months postoperatively (p < 0.04). The emotional domain improved significantly at 12 months postoperatively compared with the preoperative scores (p < 0.03). Patients with malignant tumors had lower scores at 6 months postoperatively compared with patients with benign lesions (p < 0.002), although the scores for both groups at 12 months postoperatively were similar. Adjuvant radiation therapy was associated with a poor QOL (p < 0.005). The results of this prospective study show that the overall deteriorated QOL of patients after anterior skull base tumor resection returns to baseline by 1 year after surgery. Histology and radiotherapy are significant predictors of health-related QOL in this population 9).

A literature search using the electronic databases of Ovid Medline and Embase. Additional articles were identified through a search using the phrase anterior skull base. Further articles were sought through hand-searching relevant journals and reference lists of identified articles.

The search strategy identified 29 articles for inclusion in a systematic review, with considerable variation between studies in population characteristics, methodological design and quality, follow-up length, and outcome assessment. The most commonly used QoL tools were the Karnofsky Performance Status and the Anterior Skull Base Questionnaire. QoL following anterior skull base surgery appears to improve beyond preoperative levels in the months after surgery. For patients undergoing endoscopic skull base surgery, the gain in QoL appears to be greater and may manifest earlier, with no clear long-term deleterious effect on sinonasal outcomes compared with open surgery.

QoL after anterior skull base surgery in adults appears to improve within several months of surgery, but earlier and to a larger extent if the endoscopic approach is used. Given the relative paucity and heterogeneity of anterior skull base tumors, large-scale prospective multicentre studies utilizing valid and reliable multidimensional QoL tools are required. This may result in improved patient care, by understanding patients' needs better and facilitating the provision of reliable outcome data for clinical trials 10).

18: Zimmer LA, Theodosopoulos PV. Anterior skull base surgery: open versus endoscopic. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2009 Apr;17(2):75-8. Review. PubMed PMID: 19374028.

19: Myers LL, Sumer BD, Lowery JE, Truelson JM, Leach JL, Sinard RJ. Changing patterns of tracheotomy use in anterior skull base surgery with free tissue reconstruction. Laryngoscope. 2009 Mar;119(3):453-8. doi: 10.1002/lary.20059. PubMed PMID: 19160431.

20: Lubbe D, Semple P, Fagan J. Advances in endoscopic sinonasal and anterior skull base surgery. S Afr Med J. 2008 Aug;98(8):623-5. PubMed PMID: 18928042.

21: Yano H, Sakihama N, Matsuo T, Nakano M, Hirano A. The composite galeal frontalis pericranial flap designed for anterior skull base surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008 Aug;122(2):79e-80e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31817d5ea9. PubMed PMID: 18626328.

22: Hayashi Y. [Case of frontal sinus carcinoma for which anterior skull base surgery was performed: application for resection of orbita]. No Shinkei Geka. 2008 Jan;36(1):71-4. Japanese. PubMed PMID: 18232324.

23: Vellin JF, Achim V, Sinardet D, Gabrillargues J, Mom T, Gilain L. Rapidly developing leptomeningeal carcinomatosis following anterior skull base surgery: a case report. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2007 Dec;34(4):565-7. Epub 2007 May 15. PubMed PMID: 17507192.

24: Yamamoto Y, Minakawa H, Kawashima K, Sugihara T, Fukuda S, Sawamura Y, Watanabe A, Nohira K. Experience with 24 cases of reconstructive anterior skull base surgery: classification and evaluation of postoperative facial appearance. Skull Base Surg. 2000;10(2):65-70. PubMed PMID: 17171103; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC1656764.

25: Thumfart WF, Freysinger W. On “Evaluation of the Contribution of CAS in Combination with the Subcranial/Subfrontal Approach in Anterior Skull Base Surgery” (Skull Base 2001;11:59-76). Skull Base. 2002 Feb;12(1):43-4. PubMed PMID: 17167643; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC1654770.

26: On “Evaluation of the Contribution of CAS in Combination with the Subcranial/Subfrontal Approach in Anterior Skull Base Surgery” (Skull Base 2001;11:59-76). Skull Base. 2002 Feb;12(1):39-40. PubMed PMID: 17167642; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC1654778.

27: Laedrach K, Remonda L, Lukes A, Schroth G, Raveh J. Evaluation of the Contribution of CAS in Combination with the Subcranial/Subfrontal Approach in Anterior Skull Base Surgery. Skull Base. 2001 Feb;11(1):59-76. PubMed PMID: 17167604; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC1656830.

28: Abergel A, Gil Z, Spektor S, Khafif A, Fliss DM. [Quality of life following anterior skull base surgery]. Harefuah. 2004 Jul;143(7):489-93, 550, 549. Hebrew. PubMed PMID: 15669422.

29: Kaplan MJ, Fischbein NJ, Harsh GR. Anterior skull base surgery. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2005 Feb;38(1):107-31, ix. Review. PubMed PMID: 15649503.

30: Gil Z, Abergel A, Spektor S, Khafif A, Fliss DM. Patient, caregiver, and surgeon perceptions of quality of life following anterior skull base surgery. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004 Nov;130(11):1276-81. PubMed PMID: 15545581.

31: Rodrigues M, O'malley BW Jr, Staecker H, Tamargo R. Extended pericranial flap and bone graft reconstruction in anterior skull base surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004 Jul;131(1):69-76. PubMed PMID: 15243560.

32: Bentz BG, Bilsky MH, Shah JP, Kraus D. Anterior skull base surgery for malignant tumors: a multivariate analysis of 27 years of experience. Head Neck. 2003 Jul;25(7):515-20. PubMed PMID: 12808653.

33: Gil Z, Cohen JT, Spektor S, Shlomi B, Fliss DM. Anterior skull base surgery without prophylactic airway diversion procedures. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2003 May;128(5):681-5. PubMed PMID: 12748561.

34: Grigorian A, Rajaraman V, Hunt CD. Traumatic intracranial aneurysms complicating anterior skull base surgery. J Craniomaxillofac Trauma. 1998 Winter;4(4):10-4. PubMed PMID: 11951275.

35: Browne JD, Mims JW. Preservation of olfaction in anterior skull base surgery. Laryngoscope. 2000 Aug;110(8):1317-22. PubMed PMID: 10942133.

36: Hazarika P, Ranjan Nayak D, Deepak Murty K, Senapati M, Dinassing A, Raja A. Anterior skull base surgery- our experience. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1998 Oct;50(4):338-44. doi: 10.1007/BF03000684. PubMed PMID: 23119455; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3451417.

37: Ichimura K, Sasaki T, Nakatsuka T, Nibu K, Sugasawa M. Analysis of tumor recurrence following anterior skull base surgery. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 1998;255(3):155-62. PubMed PMID: 9561865.

38: Hazarika P, Nayak DR, Murty KD, Senapati M, Dinassing A, Raja A. Anterior skull base surgery-our experience. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1997 Oct;49(4):353-9. doi: 10.1007/BF02994650. PubMed PMID: 23119328; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3450894.

39: Jones NS. Visual evoked potentials in endoscopic and anterior skull base surgery: a review. J Laryngol Otol. 1997 Jun;111(6):513-6. Review. PubMed PMID: 9231082.

40: Ichimura K, Nibu K, Tanaka T, Takekoshi H, Sasaki T, Taniguchi M, Nakatsuka T. Anterior skull base surgery for secondary malignancies in retinoblastoma survivors: report of two cases. Skull Base Surg. 1997;7(1):39-41. PubMed PMID: 17171005; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC1656613.

41: Deschler DG, Gutin PH, Mamelak AN, McDermott MW, Kaplan MJ. Complications of anterior skull base surgery. Skull Base Surg. 1996;6(2):113-8. PubMed PMID: 17170985; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC1656572.

42: Pinsolle J, San-Galli F, Siberchicot F, Caix P, Emparanza A, Michelet FX. Modified approach for ethmoid and anterior skull base surgery. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1991 Jul;117(7):779-82. PubMed PMID: 1863445.

43: Schramm VL Jr, Myers EN, Maroon JC. Anterior skull base surgery for benign and malignant disease. Laryngoscope. 1979 Jul;89(7 Pt 1):1077-91. PubMed PMID: 449551.


1)
Zimmer LA, Theodosopoulos PV. Anterior skull base surgery: open versus endoscopic. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2009 Apr;17(2):75-8. Review. PubMed PMID: 19374028.
2)
Lubbe D, Semple P, Fagan J. Advances in endoscopic sinonasal and anterior skull base surgery. S Afr Med J. 2008 Aug;98(8):623-5. PubMed PMID: 18928042.
3)
Kuriakose MA, Trivedi NP, Kekatpure V. Anterior skull base surgery. Indian J Surg Oncol. 2010 Apr;1(2):133-45. doi: 10.1007/s13193-010-0027-5. Epub 2010 Nov 21. PubMed PMID: 22930628; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3421004.
4)
Spektor S, Dotan S, Mizrahi CJ. Safety of drilling for clinoidectomy and optic canal unroofing in anterior skull base surgery. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2013 Jun;155(6):1017-24. doi: 10.1007/s00701-013-1704-2. Epub 2013 Apr 20. PubMed PMID: 23605256.
5)
Borghei-Razavi H, Truong HQ, Fernandes-Cabral DT, Celtikci E, Chabot JD, Stefko ST, Wang EW, Snyderman CH, Cohen-Gadol A, Gardner PA, Fernández-Miranda JC. Minimally Invasive Approaches for Anterior Skull Base Meningiomas: Supraorbital Eyebrow, Endoscopic Endonasal, or a Combination of Both? Anatomic Study, Limitations, and Surgical Application. World Neurosurg. 2018 Apr;112:e666-e674. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.01.119. Epub 2018 Feb 19. PubMed PMID: 29378344.
6)
Pepper JP, Lin EM, Sullivan SE, Marentette LJ. Perioperative lumbar drain placement: an independent predictor of tension pneumocephalus and intracranial complications following anterior skull base surgery. Laryngoscope. 2011 Mar;121(3):468-73. doi: 10.1002/lary.21409. Epub 2011 Feb 4. PubMed PMID: 21298642.
7)
Ackerman PD, Spencer DA, Prabhu VC. The efficacy and safety of preoperative lumbar drain placement in anterior skull base surgery. J Neurol Surg Rep. 2013 Jun;74(1):1-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1331022. Epub 2013 Jan 2. PubMed PMID: 23943713; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3713560.
8)
Gross ND, Ganly I, Patel SG, Bilsky MH, Shah JP, Kraus DH. Results of anterior skull base surgery in pediatric and young adult patients. Skull Base. 2010 Mar;20(2):75-81. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1238215. PubMed PMID: 20808531; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2853072.
9)
Abergel A, Fliss DM, Margalit N, Gil Z. A prospective evaluation of short-term health-related quality of life in patients undergoing anterior skull base surgery. Skull Base. 2010 Jan;20(1):27-33. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1242982. PubMed PMID: 20592855; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2853063.
10)
Kirkman MA, Borg A, Al-Mousa A, Haliasos N, Choi D. Quality-of-Life after Anterior Skull Base Surgery: A Systematic Review. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2014 Apr;75(2):73-89. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1359303. Epub 2013 Dec 11. PubMed PMID: 24719794; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3969436.
  • anterior_skull_base_surgery.txt
  • Last modified: 2025/05/13 02:21
  • by 127.0.0.1