Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion classification
Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion procedures can be classified based on several criteria, including the number of levels treated, surgical technique, and the type of implants used.
### 1. Based on the Number of Levels Treated - Single-level ACDF: Fusion between two adjacent vertebrae (e.g., C5-C6).
Multiple-Level Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion Fusion involving three or more vertebrae (e.g., C4-C6).
Two-level cervical discectomy and fusion
—
### 2. Based on Surgical Approach - Right-sided approach: Less commonly used, depending on surgeon preference and patient anatomy. - Left-sided approach: More commonly used due to anatomical considerations, such as the position of the esophagus and carotid artery.
—
### 3. Based on Type of Implant or Material Used - Interbody spacers:
- PEEK (polyetheretherketone) spacers.
- Titanium spacers.
- Biological materials such as autografts or allografts.
- Cervical plates: Placed with screws to enhance stability. - ACDF without plates: Utilizes standalone devices or implants integrated into the spacer.
—
### 4. Based on Fusion Technique - Static fusion: Implants designed to maintain a fixed position between vertebrae. - Dynamic fusion: Implants allowing initial controlled movement to encourage bone healing.
—
### 5. Based on Surgical Goals - Simple decompression: Indicated for radiculopathy or myelopathy caused by herniated discs. - Deformity correction: Addressing cervical lordosis or more complex spinal deformities.
—
### 6. Based on Postoperative Radiological Outcomes - Solid fusion: Complete bony consolidation between adjacent vertebrae. - Pseudoarthrosis: Failure of fusion with persistent motion at the treated segment. - Implant failure: Displacement or malposition of the plate or interbody spacer.
—
### Additional Classifications Relevant to ACDF - Modic Classification: Identifies degenerative changes in vertebral endplates. - Pfirrmann Classification: Grades disc degeneration.