Show pageBacklinksCite current pageExport to PDFBack to top This page is read only. You can view the source, but not change it. Ask your administrator if you think this is wrong. ====== MINT ====== It is unclear how effective [[RFD]] is at relieving [[LBP]]. [[NICE]] 2016 (NG59) guidance ((CG59 N. Low back pain and sciatica in over 16s: assessment and management. In: NICE, editor, 2016. Available at: http://nice.org.uk/guidance/ng59)) on [[LBP]] recommends [[RFD]] as a treatment option for people with suspected facetogenic LBP who fail to respond to [[conservative treatment]] and respond positively to [[medial branch]] blocks (MBBs). A subsequent (2017) Dutch study ([[MINT]]), found no benefit from the addition of RFD to an exercise program for people with LBP who had responded positively to a MBB ((Juch JNS, Maas ET, Ostelo R, et al. Effect of radiofrequency denervation on pain intensity among patients with chronic low back pain: the mint randomized clinical trials. JAMA 2017; 318(1): 68–81.)). The MINT study was heavily criticized for multiple reasons, including the utilization of a sub-optimal [[Lumbar facet joint denervation technique]], which was inconsistently delivered ((Provenzano DA, Buvanendran A, de Leon-Casasola OA, et al. Interpreting the MINT randomized trials evaluating radiofrequency ablation for lumbar facet and sacroiliac joint pain: a call from ASRA for better education, study design, and performance. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2018; 43(1): 68–71.)) ((Van Kuijk SMJ, Van Zundert J, Hans G, et al. Flawed study design and incorrect presentation of data negatively impact potentially useful interventional treatments for patients with low back pain: a critical review of JAMA’s MinT study. Pain Pract 2018; 18(3): 292–295.)). mint.txt Last modified: 2024/06/07 02:50by 127.0.0.1