Show pageBacklinksCite current pageExport to PDFBack to top This page is read only. You can view the source, but not change it. Ask your administrator if you think this is wrong. ====== Editorial Laxity ====== Acceptance of low-evidence studies – Case reports or single-case studies with no statistical or clinical weight get published without justification. Tolerating inflated conclusions – Articles make bold or speculative claims not supported by data, and reviewers or editors let it pass. Prioritizing novelty or image quality – Preference is given to visually appealing or technically novel work, even if it lacks clinical value. Inadequate peer review – Poor or superficial reviewer comments, or peer review done by conflicted or unqualified reviewers. Thematic drift – Journal content moves away from core clinical relevance toward imaging gimmicks, academic padding, or trendy topics. editorial_laxity.txt Last modified: 2025/06/20 05:42by administrador