Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- jasp [2025/07/01 16:40] – created administrador
+++ jasp [2025/07/01 16:42] (current) – administrador
@@ Line 40: / Line 40: @@
+====== Better Alternatives to JASP ======
+=== 🥇 R with Meta-Analysis Packages (metafor, meta, netmeta) ===
+  * ✅ Full scripting flexibility for complex and customized meta-analyses
+  * ✅ Supports network meta-analysis, multivariate models, and Bayesian methods
+  * ✅ Integrates with R Markdown for reproducible research reports
+  * ➕ **Why better than JASP:**
+    Greater control, transparency, and methodological sophistication
+=== 🔍 Comprehensive Meta-Analysis (CMA) ===
+  * ✅ User-friendly GUI tailored to meta-analysis
+  * ✅ Supports subgroup and sensitivity analyses and other advanced features
+  * ✅ Widely used in clinical research with strong support
+  * ➕ **Why better than JASP:**
+    More focused and feature-rich for meta-analytic purposes
+=== 🤖 AI-Augmented Tools: Elicit + RobotReviewer ===
+  * ✅ Automate literature screening, data extraction, and bias assessment
+  * ✅ Reduce manual workload and increase accuracy
+  * ➕ **Why better than JASP:**
+    Streamlines upstream review tasks typically manual in JASP workflows
+=== 🔧 Systematic Review Platforms: Covidence, DistillerSR ===
+  * ✅ Manage full systematic review workflow: screening, extraction, bias assessment, export
+  * ✅ Collaboration-friendly with version control and audit trails
+  * ➕ **Why better than JASP:**
+    Supports entire review lifecycle, not just statistical analysis
+=== 📊 Summary Table ===
+^ Tool                        ^ Strengths                                    ^ Why Better Than JASP                         ^
+| R (metafor, meta, netmeta) | Advanced scripting, flexibility, reproducibility | Maximum control and transparency             |
+| Comprehensive Meta-Analysis | GUI with rich meta-analytic features             | More advanced and focused than JASP           |
+| Elicit + RobotReviewer      | AI-assisted extraction and bias assessment       | Automates and accelerates manual processes     |
+| Covidence / DistillerSR     | Full systematic review management                  | Manages complete SR workflow collaboratively    |
+=== 🧠 Final Recommendation ===
+  * Use **[[R packages]]** for advanced and reproducible meta-analyses.
+  * Use **[[CMA]]** for GUI-driven, feature-rich meta-analysis.
+  * Use **[[Elicit]] and [[RobotReviewer]]** to automate evidence extraction and bias assessment.
+  * Use **[[Covidence]] or [[DistillerSR]]** to manage the entire systematic review process.
+  * Use **[[JASP]]** primarily for teaching and simple exploratory analyses.