This is an old revision of the document!
JASP
🧱 Overpromised Accessibility, Underdelivered Depth
JASP markets itself as a user-friendly GUI for statistical analysis, but this ease of use comes at the cost of limited methodological depth and flexibility.
- The simplified interface encourages black-box application of statistics without fostering true understanding.
- Advanced users find the software restrictive, lacking support for custom models, complex data structures, and scripting.
- The default settings and automated procedures may lead novices to misuse or misinterpret results.
🔍 Limited Statistical and Meta-Analytic Features
- While JASP supports basic meta-analysis, it lacks advanced capabilities such as network meta-analysis, multivariate models, and robust meta-regression.
- The Bayesian methods implemented are simplistic and do not cover the breadth needed for nuanced inference.
- Diagnostic tools for heterogeneity, publication bias, and influence analyses are basic or missing.
🤖 No Integration with Automation or Data Extraction Tools
- JASP operates in isolation, with no built-in support for literature screening, data extraction, or risk of bias assessment.
- It offers no API or scripting interface, limiting reproducibility and workflow automation.
- Collaboration features are minimal or nonexistent.
📉 Reproducibility and Transparency Issues
- Although JASP allows export of analysis scripts, the lack of full scripting limits transparency compared to command-line alternatives.
- Version control and project management features are weak, hindering collaborative reproducible research.
- Output reports are standardized but offer limited customization.
⚠️ Accessibility vs. Professionalism Trade-Off
- JASP’s low barrier to entry can foster overconfidence among inexperienced users, increasing risk of analytical errors.
- Professional statisticians and methodologists often reject JASP due to its limited scope and control.
- The software’s popularity in teaching may not translate to rigorous research environments.
🧨 Final Verdict
JASP is a convenient tool for introductory statistics and teaching, but it is unsuitable for complex, high-stakes meta-analyses or advanced research. Its simplistic interface, limited features, and poor integration hinder rigorous evidence synthesis and reproducibility.
Recommendation: Use JASP for learning or exploratory data analysis only. For robust meta-analytic work, prefer more flexible and transparent tools like R packages or advanced workflow platforms.