This is an old revision of the document!


JASP

🧱 Overpromised Accessibility, Underdelivered Depth

JASP markets itself as a user-friendly GUI for statistical analysis, but this ease of use comes at the cost of limited methodological depth and flexibility.

  • The simplified interface encourages black-box application of statistics without fostering true understanding.
  • Advanced users find the software restrictive, lacking support for custom models, complex data structures, and scripting.
  • The default settings and automated procedures may lead novices to misuse or misinterpret results.

🔍 Limited Statistical and Meta-Analytic Features

  • While JASP supports basic meta-analysis, it lacks advanced capabilities such as network meta-analysis, multivariate models, and robust meta-regression.
  • The Bayesian methods implemented are simplistic and do not cover the breadth needed for nuanced inference.
  • Diagnostic tools for heterogeneity, publication bias, and influence analyses are basic or missing.

🤖 No Integration with Automation or Data Extraction Tools

  • JASP operates in isolation, with no built-in support for literature screening, data extraction, or risk of bias assessment.
  • It offers no API or scripting interface, limiting reproducibility and workflow automation.
  • Collaboration features are minimal or nonexistent.

📉 Reproducibility and Transparency Issues

  • Although JASP allows export of analysis scripts, the lack of full scripting limits transparency compared to command-line alternatives.
  • Version control and project management features are weak, hindering collaborative reproducible research.
  • Output reports are standardized but offer limited customization.

⚠️ Accessibility vs. Professionalism Trade-Off

  • JASP’s low barrier to entry can foster overconfidence among inexperienced users, increasing risk of analytical errors.
  • Professional statisticians and methodologists often reject JASP due to its limited scope and control.
  • The software’s popularity in teaching may not translate to rigorous research environments.

🧨 Final Verdict

JASP is a convenient tool for introductory statistics and teaching, but it is unsuitable for complex, high-stakes meta-analyses or advanced research. Its simplistic interface, limited features, and poor integration hinder rigorous evidence synthesis and reproducibility.

Recommendation: Use JASP for learning or exploratory data analysis only. For robust meta-analytic work, prefer more flexible and transparent tools like R packages or advanced workflow platforms.

  • jasp.1751388058.txt.gz
  • Last modified: 2025/07/01 16:40
  • by administrador