In a review Kitagawa et al. from McGovern Medical School at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston published in Neurosurgical Clinics of North America to review fever etiology in neurocritically ill patients, assessed current pharmacologic and mechanical strategies for temperature control, and evaluated the existing evidence on whether these interventions improve clinical outcomes. The goal was to inform clinical decision-making in the neuro ICU setting. They concuded that fever is common in neuro ICU patients and is associated with worse outcomes. While several interventions effectively reduce body temperature, the literature remains inconclusive regarding their impact on prognosis. Management should be individualized, weighing the potential benefits against adverse effects. Further research is needed to clarify the clinical value of temperature control in this population 4)
Another polished yet pointless review, safely orbiting the surface of a real clinical problem without offering a single actionable insight. If you’ve spent time in a Neuro-ICU, you already know everything this article says. And if you haven’t — reading it won’t help you survive your next febrile crisis.