Temporal hollowing after pterional craniotomy

The temporal muscle atrophy or temporal hollowing seems to be the patient's main complaint. Only 17 (44.73%) studies addressed patient satisfaction regarding the aesthetics, and only 10 (26.31%) of the studies reported the cosmetic outcome as a primary outcome. Nevertheless, minimally invasive approaches appear to overcome most cosmetic complaints and should be performed whenever possible 1)


Several alternatives are available to fill the hollowing of the supratemporal fossa during cranial reconstruction, but each has a disadvantage, whether it is expensive or difficult to shape for bilateral symmetry. Park et al. solved the cosmetic problem by using a properly carved silicone block to fill the supratemporal fossa while conducting cranioplasty, and here reports it with a literature review 2).

A modified osteoplastic pterional craniotomy significantly reduced atrophy of temporal muscle and caused proportionally less frontal muscle nerve damage compared with pterional craniotomy, although this latter outcome was not significant. These findings suggest that osteoplastic craniotomy may be a more advantageous intervention in cosmetic and functional terms compared with classical pterional craniotomy 3).


The suprafascial dissection technique does not cause permanent injury of the FTFN, and this approach results in a significantly lower incidence of postoperative temporal hollowing than interfascial dissection, especially without leaving a temporalis muscle cuff. 4).


The osteomyoplastic flap showed a less severe hollowing in the temple although it demands more time in order to perform it. The frequency of complications seems to be the same 5).

Reconstruction of frontotemporal lesions using Medpor® implants after the pterional approach improved temporal hollowing without additional complications 6).


Kim et al. developed a method of temporal augmentation using a calvarial onlay graft as a single-stage neurosurgical reconstructive operation in patients requiring craniotomy. In this report, we describe the surgical details and review our institutional outcomes. The patients were divided into pterional craniotomy and onlay graft groups. Clinical temporal hollowing was assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS). Temporal soft tissue thickness was measured on preoperative and postoperative computed tomography (CT) studies. Both the VAS and CT-based assessments were compared between the groups. Our review indicated that the use of an onlay graft was associated with a lower VAS score and left-right discrepancy in the temporal contour than were observed in patients undergoing pterional craniotomy without an onlay graft 7).

CT data of patients who received craniectomy and conventional CAD cranioplasty in Mainz between 2012 and 2018 were analyzed. CT datasets prior to craniectomy and after cranioplasty were subtracted to quantify the volume and localization of the defect.

Out of 91 patients, 21 had suitable datasets. Five cases had good cosmetic results with no defect visible, 16 patients had an apparent hollowing defect. Their average defect volume was 5.0 cm3 ± 4.5 cm3. The defect localizations were in the area behind the zygomatic process and just below the superior temporal line, covering an area of app. 3×3 cm2. Surgical attempts of temporal muscle restoration were more often found in reports of good results (p<0.01), but also in 50% of reports, whose surgeries resulted in hollowing of the temple. Mean time between the two surgeries was 112 ± 43 days. No significant differences between patients with and without hollowing defect were detected regarding time between the two surgeries, age or performing surgeon.

This work supplies evidence for the indication of a surgical corrective during cranioplasty in the small but cosmetically relevant area of the “frontozygomatic shadow”. Based on these 3D data analysis, future focused surgical strategies may obtain better aesthetical results here 8).


Temporal hollowing after pterional craniotomy is an unavoidable result. Bone, temporalis muscle, and soft tissues are combined etiologies. No predictive factors including age, sex, causes, operative time, radiation, and surgical technique are demonstrated. Volume of temporal area reduction was 19.74 cm 3 . Immediate reconstruction is recommended and volume of reconstruction is calculated from preoperative imaging 9)


Temporal hollowing occurs to varying degrees after pterional craniotomy. The most common cause of temporal hollowing is a bone defect of the pterional and temporal regions due to the resection of the sphenoid ridge and temporal squama for adequate exposure without overhang. The augmentation of such bony defects is important in preventing craniofacial deformities and postoperative hollowness. Temporal cranioplasty has been performed using a range of materials, such as acrylics, porous polyethylene, bone cement, titanium, muscle flaps, and prosthetic dermis. These methods are limited by the risk of damage to adjacent tissue and infection, a prolonged preparation phase, the possibility of reabsorption, and cost inefficiency. Kim et al have developed a method of temporal augmentation using a calvarial onlay graft as a single-stage neurosurgical reconstructive operation in patients requiring craniotomy. In this report, they describe the surgical details and review our institutional outcomes. The patients were divided into pterional craniotomy and onlay graft groups. Clinical temporal hollowing was assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS). Temporal soft tissue thickness was measured on preoperative and postoperative computed tomography (CT) studies. Both the VAS and CT-based assessments were compared between the groups. The review indicated that the use of an onlay graft was associated with a lower VAS score and left-right discrepancy in the temporal contour than were observed in patients undergoing pterional craniotomy without an onlay graft 10).


Ninety-eight consecutive patients underwent reconstruction of pterional and temporal defects after FT and OZ craniotomy using the Medpor Titan implant. The implant was shaped to recreate the pterion to provide coverage for the cranial defect and to bolster the temporalis muscle to prevent temporal hollowing. The implant was then secured to the bone flap with titanium screws. Cosmetic evaluation was performed from both surgeon's and patient's perspective.

Of 90 patients who underwent cosmetic assessment at the 3 month follow-up, temporalis asymmetry was noticed subjectively by three patients and noted in 7 patients by the surgeon. Orbital asymmetry was not noticed in any cases by either surgeon or patient. Overall patient satisfaction was found in 89 of 90 patients (98.9%). There were no cases of temporal hollowing. One patient had a delayed wound infection, and one had an inflammatory reaction that required removal of the implant.

The technique using the Medpor Titan implant is a fast and effective method for pterional reconstruction after FT and OZ craniotomy with excellent cosmetic results and patient satisfaction. The implant combines the advantages of both porous polyethylene and titanium mesh, including easy custom-shaping without sharp edges, structural support and relatively lower cost. 11).

A patient who had a skull defect restored using a precisely shaped implant engineered via a computer using the opposite temporalis muscle as a mirror image. Polyether-ether-ketone cranioplasty was performed for the 52-year-old man with temporal hollowing after DC with resection of the temporalis muscle and fascia, due to a ruptured cerebral arteriovenous fistula.

The shape of the patient's surgical side was restored and not asymmetrical. The patient was very satisfied.

In the case of cranioplasty (CP) in patients with DC with resection of the temporalis muscle, CP with implants that include the opposite muscle may increase patient satisfaction without the risk of additional complications 12)


1)
Gonçalves DB, Dos Santos MIA, de Cristo Rojas Cabral L, Oliveira LM, da Silva Coutinho GC, Dutra BG, Martins RV, Reis F, Paiva WS, de Amorim RLO. Esthetics outcomes in patients submitted to pterional craniotomy and its variants: A scoping review. Surg Neurol Int. 2021 Sep 13;12:461. doi: 10.25259/SNI_485_2021. PMID: 34621576; PMCID: PMC8492413.
2)
Park KH, Park B, Byoun HS, Lim J. Augmentation of Supratemporal Hollowing With Silicone Block During Autologous Cranioplasty After Decompressive Craniectomy With Additional Temporalis Resection. J Craniofac Surg. 2021 Oct 1;32(7):e645-e647. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000007651. PMID: 33852524.
3)
Seçer M, Çam İ, Gökbel A, Ulutaş M, Çakır Ö, Ergen A, Çınar K. Effects of Modified Osteoplastic Pterional Craniotomy on Temporal Muscle Volume and Frontal Muscle Nerve Function. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2021 Dec 29;83(5):554-558. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1741005. PMID: 36097502; PMCID: PMC9462957.
4)
Sriamornrattanakul K, Akharathammachote N, Wongsuriyanan S. Suprafascial dissection for pterional craniotomy to preserve the frontotemporal branch of the facial nerve with less temporal hollowing. Surg Neurol Int. 2021 Nov 16;12:559. doi: 10.25259/SNI_999_2021. PMID: 34877045; PMCID: PMC8645485.
5)
Grajeda-García FM, Mercado-Caloca F. El colgajo osteomioplástico, una contribución al arte de la neurocirugía [The osteomyoplastic flap, a contribution to neurosurgery]. Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc. 2011 Nov-Dec;49(6):649-54. Spanish. PMID: 22176828.
6)
Im SH, Song J, Park SK, Rha EY, Han YM. Cosmetic Reconstruction of Frontotemporal Depression Using Polyethylene Implant after Pterional Craniotomy. Biomed Res Int. 2018 Oct 21;2018:1982726. doi: 10.1155/2018/1982726. PMID: 30420957; PMCID: PMC6215591.
7)
Kim JH, Lee R, Shin CH, Kim HK, Han YS. Temporal augmentation with calvarial onlay graft during pterional craniotomy for prevention of temporal hollowing. Arch Craniofac Surg. 2018 Jun;19(2):94-101. doi: 10.7181/acfs.2018.01781. Epub 2018 Apr 28. PMID: 29716176; PMCID: PMC6057125.
8)
Kosterhon M, Ruegg E, Ottenhausen M, Kühn A, Ringel F, Jägersberg M. Quantitative assessment and localization of the hollowing of the temple aftercraniectomy and cranioplasty-The frontozygomatic shadow. PLoS One. 2021 Oct 19;16(10):e0258776. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258776. PMID: 34665840; PMCID: PMC8525753.
9)
Thiensri T, Limpoka A, Burusapat C. Analysis of Factors Associated with Temporal Hollowing after Pterional Craniotomy. Indian J Plast Surg. 2020 Mar;53(1):71-82. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1709953. Epub 2020 Apr 23. PMID: 32367920; PMCID: PMC7192707.
10)
Kim YS, Yi HS, Kim HK, Han YS. Effectiveness of Temporal Augmentation Using a Calvarial Onlay Graft during Pterional Craniotomy. Arch Plast Surg. 2016 Mar;43(2):204-209. Epub 2016 Mar 18. PubMed PMID: 27019813.
11)
Choudhry OJ, Christiano LD, Arnaout O, Adel JG, Liu JK. Reconstruction of pterional defects after frontotemporal and orbitozygomatic craniotomy using Medpor Titan implant: cosmetic results in 98 patients. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2013 Sep;115(9):1716-20. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2013.03.014. Epub 2013 Apr 22. PMID: 23619535.
12)
Park G, Kim J, Chang C, Jung Y. Pre-Planned Cranioplasty Using Computer-Assisted Designed Temporalis Muscle Augmentation in Patients With Decompressive Craniectomy Involving Resection of the Temporalis Muscle. J Craniofac Surg. 2021 Jan-Feb 01;32(1):e60-e62. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000006928. PMID: 32858613.
  • temporal_hollowing_after_pterional_craniotomy.txt
  • Last modified: 2024/06/07 02:57
  • by 127.0.0.1