Patient satisfaction metrics

• IDNet: A Diffusion Model-Enhanced Framework for Accurate Cranio-Maxillofacial Bone Defect Repair
• The Role of Claude 3.5 Sonet and ChatGPT-4 in Posterior Cervical Fusion Patient Guidance
• Enhanced recovery after surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a revised systematic review and meta‑analysis
• Cause and effect of revisions in adult spinal deformity surgery: a multicenter study on outcomes based on etiology
• Development of the pediatric neuro-oncology services assessment aid: An assessment tool for pediatric neuro-oncology service delivery capacity
• Caregiver-reported satisfaction with pediatric movement disorder surgery
• Impact of Empowerment Theory-Based Nursing Intervention on the Quality of Life and Negative Emotions of Patients Diagnosed with Brain Metastasis Post Breast Cancer Surgery
• Anterior vertebral body tethering shows clinically comparable shoulder balance outcomes to posterior spinal fusion

Patient satisfaction metrics is a measure used to assess patients' overall satisfaction with their healthcare experiences. These metrics are often used by healthcare providers, hospitals, and clinics to identify areas for improvement and to monitor changes in patient satisfaction over time.

Some common patient satisfaction metrics include:

Patient satisfaction surveys

Net Promoter Score (NPS): NPS is a metric used to measure customer loyalty in many industries, including healthcare. Patients are asked to rate their likelihood of recommending the healthcare provider or facility to others on a scale of 0-10. Those who rate the provider or facility 9-10 are considered promoters, while those who rate it 0-6 are considered detractors. The NPS is calculated by subtracting the percentage of detractors from the percentage of promoters.

Complaints and grievances: Tracking patient complaints and grievances can provide valuable insights into areas where improvements are needed.

Online reviews: Patients may post reviews of healthcare providers or facilities on various online platforms. These reviews can provide feedback on the patient experience and may impact a provider's reputation and patient volume.

Follow-up appointments: Patients who schedule follow-up appointments are more likely to have had a positive experience with their healthcare provider.

Patient satisfaction metrics can be used to identify areas for improvement and to track changes in patient satisfaction over time. They can also be used to benchmark against other healthcare providers or facilities and to demonstrate a commitment to quality patient care.

Patient satisfaction metrics are emerging as determinants of quality of care and reimbursement after spine surgery. Identifying modifiable factors that improve satisfaction is of utmost importance.

Patient satisfaction with the outcome may accurately represent the effectiveness of surgical spine care in terms of 1-year improvement in pain and disability. However, healthcare stakeholders relying on satisfaction as a proxy of overall quality or effectiveness of care need to account for Medicaid/uninsured payer status and worse baseline pain and disability scores as confounders ¹⁾.

Patient satisfaction is not a valid measure of the overall quality or effectiveness of surgical spine care. Patient satisfaction metrics likely represent the patient's subjective contentment with health-care service, a distinct aspect of care. Satisfaction metrics are important patient-centered measures of health-care service but should not be used as a proxy for the overall quality, safety, or effectiveness of surgical spine care ²⁾