Open Peer Review

Open Science movement


This approach involves publishing the review process along with the manuscript, allowing for transparency and accountability. This can also help to reduce bias and conflicts of interest.


A more complete and fair method of recognizing the contribution of a reviewer to the final version of the article, would be to list them in the article, which would require open peer reviews. Journals and indexers can organize systems to provide public recognition to open reviewers, but more educational efforts are required to change the mind of those defending the old-fashioned blind and double-blind peer review processes 1) 2).


1)
Wicherts JM. Peer review quality and transparency of the peer-review process in open access and subscription journals. PLoS One. 2016;11(1):e0147913. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0147913.
2)
Transparency in peer review. Nat Hum Behav. 2019;3(12):1237. doi: 10.1038/s41562-019-0799-8.
  • open_peer_review.txt
  • Last modified: 2024/06/07 02:59
  • by 127.0.0.1