The Trigemino-Vocal Reflex (TVR) is a recently described neurophysiological phenomenon that may serve as a potential marker of brainstem functional integrity. Although still under investigation, it holds promise for clinical use in assessing severely brain-injured or comatose patients.
The TVR refers to an involuntary activation of vocal or laryngeal muscles — such as phonation or vocal cord movement — triggered by sensory stimulation in the trigeminal nerve territory, usually the face (e.g., cheek, forehead).
The Trigemino-Vocal Reflex represents a promising but still exploratory neurophysiological marker. Its presence may reflect intact brainstem networks and could aid in prognostic evaluation and monitoring in patients with impaired consciousness. Further validation in larger clinical studies is required before routine clinical use.
In a Letter Choi *et al.* from the Korea University Anam Hospital, Seoul published in the Journal Clinical Neurophysiology they proposes a novel “Trigemino‑Vocal Reflex” as a potential marker of brainstem integrative function. The concept is introduced, but no data or methodology is shared in this letter format—its validity and clinical relevance remain unproven 1). 2)
- The paper merely *introduces* the term “Trigemino‑Vocal Reflex” without specifying stimulation parameters, recording techniques, patient cohort, control populations, or results. - Without any empirical data or case illustration, this contribution feels speculative and lacks evidence.
- Tone is descriptive yet vague; structure follows a bare-bones letter format. - It lacks the usual sections (Methods, Results, Discussion) crucial for neurosurgical interpretation or application.
- Impossible to assess validity—no methodology, no quantitative measures, no reliability information. - We have no idea whether reflex latency/amplitude changes exist, whether they correlate with pathology, or how reproducible these findings are.
- As is, this letter offers zero clinical utility: no guidance for intraoperative monitoring, patient prognosis, or diagnostic use. - The concept might be interesting, but without data it remains academic fluff.
* Overall verdict: Too premature for any clinical integration. * Takeaway: A hypothesis without data—wait for a full study with rigorous neurophysiology. * Bottom Line: Introduces a reflex concept but lacks any actionable content—worth watching, not using. * Rating: 2/10 (interesting concept, zero substantiation).
“Trigemino‑Vocal Reflex: A potential indicator of brainstem integration”, *Clin Neurophysiol.* 2025 Jun 14;2110796. doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2025.2110796 Choi, J. (corresponding author) — doongule@gmail.com
References