Multiple-choice question

• Use and Acceptance of Innovative Digital Health Solutions Among Patients and Professionals: Survey Study
• Students as Teachers: Creating Multiple-Choice Questions to Foster Higher-Order Thinking
• Effectiveness of Different Teaching Modalities in Human Gross Anatomy Education
• Non-clinician involvement in interprofessional health sciences education: educator experiences and attitudes
• Evaluating the Accuracy and Reliability of Large Language Models (ChatGPT, Claude, DeepSeek, Gemini, Grok, and Le Chat) in Answering Item-Analyzed Multiple-Choice Questions on Blood Physiology
• Insights from the global education survey on the use of VR-haptics in dental education
• Impact of GLP-1 Receptor Agonists on Perceived Eating Behaviors in Response to Stimuli
• Perspectives of people with diabetes on AI-integrated wearable devices: perceived benefits, barriers, and opportunities for self-management

ChatGPT-4o demonstrates the potential for efficiently generating MCQs but lacks the depth needed for complex assessments. Human review remains essential to ensure quality. Combining AI efficiency with expert oversight could optimize question creation for high-stakes exams, offering a scalable model for medical education that balances time efficiency and content quality ¹⁾