Clinical Scenario | Suggested Management |
---|---|
Asymptomatic | Observation |
Seizures | AEDs ± Surgical resection if refractory |
Recurrent hemorrhages | Surgery if accessible ± SRS |
Brainstem/thalamic lesion | Observation or SRS (case-by-case) |
Familial cases | Genetic testing and family screening |
3. XRT or stereotactic radiosurgery 1) 2) 3) 4)
Controversial: results appear comparable to natural history
No randomized prospective study has been done. Determining treatment response is difficult since no imaging study can prove the elimination of the lesion. Therefore it has been suggested that recurrent hemorrhage rate be followed as an endpoint.
The surgical management should be rationalized based on the lesion location, the eloquent of the surrounding parenchyma, mass effect, and the risks of re-rupture. Due to the rarity of multiple simultaneous hemorrhages, the management of multiple cavernomas remains controversial. The patient's relatives can be screened with MRI to rule out the familial form of the disease. Strict clinical and radiological follow-up is a must in such patients 5).
A consensus for surgical intervention was reached on the importance of the patient's age, symptomatology, and hemorrhagic recurrence; and the CM's location and size. The employment of advanced MRI techniques is considered of value for surgical planning. Observation for asymptomatic eloquent or deep-seated CMs represents the commonest practice among the panel. Surgical resection is considered when a deep-seated CM becomes symptomatic or after a second bleeding episode. Asymptomatic, image-proven hemorrhages constituted no indication for surgical resection for the panelists. Consensus was also reached on not resecting any developmental venous anomalies, and on resecting the associated hemosiderin rim only in epilepsy cases 6)
Asymptomatic, incidentally discovered CMs should be managed expectantly with serial imaging studies for about 2–3 years (to rule-out frequent subclinical bleeds); additional studies thereafter based on clinical grounds. However, some experts recommend removal for single, easily accessible incidental CMs in the non-eloquent brain 7).
Since the radiographic appearance is almost pathognomonic, biopsy or excision solely to verify the diagnosis is rarely appropriate.