Critical Review: Interventional Neuroradiology Journal

๐Ÿ“Š Journal Profile & Impact

These metrics place INR in the mid-tier (Q2) among neuroradiology journals.

๐Ÿงช Strengths

  1. Focused Scope: Excels at case reports, novel techniques, and translational studies in interventional neuroradiology.
  2. International Editorial Board: Members from Mayo Clinic, Oxford, Tokyo, etc.
  3. Ethical Standards: Member of COPE (Committee on Publication Ethics).

โš ๏ธ Areas for Improvement

  1. Modest Citation Impact: Lower than top-tier journals such as JNIS or *Neuroradiology*.
  2. Few High-Level Trials: Mostly observational studies; rare randomized controlled trials.
  3. Quality Variability: Some studies with limited statistical or methodological robustness.

๐Ÿ” Comparative Context

Compared to journals like:

INR has less international prestige. Landmark clinical trials often appear in general medical journals like NEJM, Lancet, or JAMA.

โœ… Final Evaluation

Feature Strength Limitation
Specialty Focus High Narrow scope
Peer Review & Ethics COPE membership Some technical/statistical issues
Clinical Trials Accepts early-stage innovations RCTs often published elsewhere
Prestige Q2 Lower visibility vs top neuro journals

Overall: A respected, specialized journal ideal for technique-oriented studies, early innovation, and practical interventional insights.

๐Ÿ›  Suggestions


Official Website โ€“ Interventional Neuroradiology (SAGE)