Critical Review: Interventional Neuroradiology Journal
๐ Journal Profile & Impact
These metrics place INR in the mid-tier (Q2) among neuroradiology journals.
๐งช Strengths
Focused Scope: Excels at case reports, novel techniques, and translational studies in interventional neuroradiology.
International Editorial Board: Members from Mayo Clinic, Oxford, Tokyo, etc.
Ethical Standards: Member of COPE (Committee on Publication Ethics).
โ ๏ธ Areas for Improvement
Modest Citation Impact: Lower than top-tier journals such as JNIS or *Neuroradiology*.
Few High-Level Trials: Mostly observational studies; rare randomized controlled trials.
Quality Variability: Some studies with limited statistical or methodological robustness.
๐ Comparative Context
Compared to journals like:
INR has less international prestige. Landmark clinical trials often appear in general medical journals like NEJM
, Lancet
, or JAMA
.
โ
Final Evaluation
Feature | Strength | Limitation |
Specialty Focus | High | Narrow scope |
Peer Review & Ethics | COPE membership | Some technical/statistical issues |
Clinical Trials | Accepts early-stage innovations | RCTs often published elsewhere |
Prestige | Q2 | Lower visibility vs top neuro journals |
Overall: A respected, specialized journal ideal for technique-oriented studies, early innovation, and practical interventional insights.
๐ Suggestions
Authors: Ideal for pilot data, case series, and technical reports. For large-scale trials, consider higher-impact venues.
Readers: Useful for staying current with procedural advances. Supplement with broader-evidence journals for guidelines and trials.
Official Website โ Interventional Neuroradiology (SAGE)