This page outlines the main types of head CT imaging, classified by contrast use, protocol, and clinical application.
Uses:
Advantages:
Uses:
Considerations:
Uses:
Technique:
Uses:
Notes:
Uses:
Parameters analyzed:
Uses:
Tools:
Uses:
Notes:
Modality | Contrast Used? | Clinical Applications |
---|---|---|
Non-Contrast CT (NCCT) | No | Trauma, stroke, hydrocephalus, hemorrhage |
Contrast-Enhanced CT | Yes | Tumors, infections, postop evaluation |
CT Angiography (CTA) | Yes | Aneurysms, AVMs, stenosis, stroke |
CT Venography (CTV) | Yes | Sinus thrombosis, venous anatomy |
CT Perfusion (CTP) | Yes | Stroke: core vs penumbra assessment |
3D Reconstruction CT | Optional | Planning, fractures, catheter visualization |
Cone-Beam CT (CBCT) | No | ENT, dental, sinus, skull base imaging |
Noncontrast CT scans are often employed in emergency situations (to quickly rule out most acute abnormalities), to evaluate bone in great detail, or as a screening test. It excels in demonstrating acute blood (EDH, SDH, IPH, SAH), fractures, foreign bodies, pneumocephalus, and hydrocephalus. It is weak in demonstrating acute stroke (DWI MRI is preferred), and often has poor signal quality in the posterior fossa (due to bone artifact).
IV enhanced CT scans are used primarily for imaging neoplasms or vascular malformations, especially in patients with contraindications to MRI. All CT contrast agents contain iodine. A typical IV dose of contrast: 60โ65 ml o fe.g.Isovue3 00ยฎ which delivers 18โ19.5 grams of iodine.
Cranial CT (CCT) scans and hospital admission are increasingly performed to rule out intracranial hemorrhage in patients after minor head injury (MHI), particularly in older patients and in those receiving antiplatelet therapy. This leads to high radiation exposure and a growing financial burden
see Postoperative computerized tomography.
see Computed Tomography for chronic subdural hematoma.
Before a biopsy, detailed imaging studies are conducted, typically using techniques such as computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). These images help identify the location and dimensions of the abnormality.
A definitive consensus on the standardization of practice of a routine repeat head CT (RHCT) scan in patients with traumatic intracranial hemorrhage is lacking.
After mTBI, worsening of repeat head CT finding is seen in a third of patients and is associated with worse outcomes. A substantial fraction of patients who require operative intervention will have no clinical changes in the first 8 hours, supporting the value of repeat head CT within this time frame 1).
Neurologic examination can be trusted and is reliable in pediatric blunt TBI patients in determining when an RHCT scan is necessary. Aziz et al. recommend that RHCT is required routinely in patients with intracranial hemorrhage with GCS score of 8 or less and in patients with GCS greater than 8 and that RHCT be performed only when there are clinical indications 2).
Routine repeat head CT scan is not warranted in patients with normal neurologic examination. Routine repeat head CT scan does not supplement the need for neurologic examination for determining management in patients with traumatic brain injury 3).
Emergency department (ED) management of mild traumatic brain injury (TBI) with any form of traumatic intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) is variable.
Since 2000, The Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, standard practice has been to obtain a repeat head computed tomography (CT) at least 6 hours after initial imaging. Patients are eligible for discharge if clinical and CT findings are stable. Whether this practice is safe is unknown.
Discharge after a repeat head CT and brief period of observation in the ED allowed early discharge of a cohort of mild TBI patients with traumatic ICH without delayed adverse outcomes. Whether this justifies the cost and radiation exposure involved with this pattern of practice requires further study 4).
High rates of head CT use for patients with hemorrhagic stroke are frequently observed, without an association with decreased mortality. A higher number of physicians consulted was associated with high-intensity use of head CT 5).
Emergent brain computed tomography (CT) scan allows for the identification of patients presenting with acute severe neurological symptoms in whom medical and surgical interventions may be lifesaving. The aim of the study was to evaluate if the time to CT from arrival at the emergency department exceeded 30 min in patients admitted with acute severe neurological symptoms. This was a retrospective register-based quality assurance study. We identified patients admitted to the emergency department with acute severe neurological symptoms between April 1st, 2016, and September 30th, 2020. Data were retrieved from the registry of acute medical team activations. We considered that time to CT from arrival at the emergency department should not exceed 30 min in more than 10% of patients. A total of 559 patients were included. Median time from arrival at the emergency department until CT scan was 24 min (IQR 16-35) in children (< 18 years), 10 min (IQR 7-17) for adults (18-59 years), and 11 min (IQR 7-16) for elders (> 60 years). This time interval exceeded 30 min for 8.2% (95% CI 6.1-10.9) of all included patients, 35.3% of children, 5.9% of adults, and 8.6% of elders. No children died within 30 days. The 30-day mortality was 21.3% (95% CI 16.4-27) in adults and 43.9% (95% CI 38.2-49.8) in elders. Time from arrival at our emergency department until brain CT scan exceeded 30 min in 8.2% of all included patients but exceeded the defined quality aim in children and could be improved 6).