Impact Metrics:
eLife does not publish clinical neurosurgery per se, but is highly relevant for:
Itβs a top choice for neurosurgeons engaged in translational research or surgical neurophysiology.
π§Ύ Verdict: A gold standard of peer review transparency and rigor. Minimal bias, constructive tone, rapid feedback.
eLife is an outstanding venue for neurosurgeons doing neuroscience-oriented, mechanism-driven, or technologically novel research. It is not a fit for standard surgical case reports, but an excellent outlet for work in:
π― If your neurosurgical research *asks a neuroscientific question* or *tests a mechanistic hypothesis* β eLife is among the best.
π§ Tip: Pair eLife submissions with a preprint on bioRxiv and reference your open peer review profile on Sciety.org to maximize transparency and reach.