Diffuse astrocytoma IDH Mutant outcome

The WHO classification for IDH-mutant grade II and grade III astrocytoma may not be as prognostically meaningful as expected.

Liu et al. aimed to develop a novel classification system based on the DNA damage response signature.

They developed the gene signature of DNA damage response with 115 samples from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. The dataset from Chinese Glioma Genome Atlas (CGGA) database with 41 samples was used as the validation set. Lasso Cox regression model was applied for selection of the best signature. Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) and gene ontology (GO) analysis were implemented to reveal its biological phenotype.

A two-gene DNA damage response signature (RAD18, MSH2) was developed using the lasso Cox regression model based on the TCGA dataset. Its prognostic efficiency was validated in the CGGA cohort. The result of the Cox regression analysis showed that the signature has better predictive accuracy than the WHO grade. The risk score was an independent prognostic factor for the overall survival of the IDH-mutant grade II and grade III astrocytoma. GSEA and GO analysis confirmed enhanced processes related to DNA damage response in high-risk group.

They developed a two-gene signature that can effectively predict the prognosis of patients with IDH-mutant grade II and grade III astrocytoma. It suggests a novel classification of astrocytoma with better prognostic accuracy based on the expression of DNA damage response genes 1).


A cohort with known IDH-mutations demonstrated a median survival of 10.9 years 2).

Pre-IDH era data showed worse prognosis with the following 3) (will now need to be validated with known IDH status):

1. age > 40 years (perhaps the most important unfavorable prognosticator)

2. astrocytoma histology

3. largest tumor diameter ≥ 6 cm

4. tumor crossing the midline

5. neurologic deficit prior to surgery

Dedifferentiation

These tumors are capable of malignant dedifferentiation, and the ultimate behavior of these tumors in adults is usually not benign, as 75% of adult tumors undergo anaplastic progression into IDH-mutant anaplastic astrocytoma and thence IDH-mutant glioblastoma, which is the major cause of morbidity, whereas pediatric diffuse astrocytomas (age<20) rarely undergo malignant degeneration 4).

WHO grade II astrocytomas tend to undergo malignant transformation more quickly when diagnosed after age 45 years. Once dedifferentiation occurs, median survival is 2–3 years beyond that event (pre-IDH era data 5)).

The UCSF preoperative grading system for WHO grade II astrocytomas 6) assigns 1 point for the presence of each of the 4 parameters shown:

The points are summed and the prognosis is

(this scale has been validated at other institutions, 7) but uses pre-IDH era data and will need to be updated).

1)
Liu Q, Wang K, Huang R, Tong X, Jiang T, Wang J, Yang P. A novel DNA damage response signature of IDH-mutant grade II and grade III astrocytoma at transcriptional level. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2020 Feb 14. doi: 10.1007/s00432-020-03132-x. [Epub ahead of print] PubMed PMID: 32060643.
2)
Reuss DE, Mamatjan Y, Schrimpf D, et al. IDH mutant diffuse and anaplastic astrocytomas have similar age at presentation and little difference in survival: a grading problem for WHO. Acta Neuropathol. 2015; 129:867–873
3)
Pignatti F, van den Bent M, Curran D, et al. Prognostic factors for survival in adult patients with cerebral low-grade glioma. J Clin Oncol. 2002; 20:2076–2084
4)
Broniscer A, Baker SJ, West AN, et al. Clinical and molecular characteristics of malignant transforma- tion of low-grade glioma in children. J Clin Oncol. 2007; 25:682–689
5)
Shafqat S, Hedley-Whyte ET, Henson JW. Age- Dependent Rate of Anaplastic Transformation in Low-Grade Astrocytoma. Neurology. 1999; 52: 867–869
6)
Chang EF, Smith JS, Chang SM, et al. Preoperative prognostic classification system for hemispheric low-grade gliomas in adults. J Neurosurg. 2008; 109:817–824
7)
Chang EF, Clark A, Jensen RL, et al. Multiinstitutional validation of the University of California at San Francisco Low-Grade Glioma Prognostic Scoring System. Clinical article. J Neurosurg. 2009; 111:203–210