ASReview

๐Ÿค– Overhyped AI with Limited Real-World Impact

ASReview markets itself as an AI-powered active learning tool to streamline systematic review screening. However, the reality reveals significant shortcomings that undermine its practical utility.

๐Ÿ” Usability and Integration Challenges

โš ๏ธ Transparency and Trust Deficits

๐Ÿงฑ Limited Scope and Adaptability

๐Ÿ“‰ Maintenance and Community Support

๐Ÿงจ Final Verdict

ASReview offers an intriguing glimpse into AI-assisted review but remains an immature, niche tool with significant limitations in usability, transparency, and real-world effectiveness. Its deployment should be cautious and supplementary, not foundational.

Recommendation: Use ASReview only as an experimental adjunct to established review processes, not as a replacement for rigorous human screening and judgment.

Better Alternatives to ASReview

๐Ÿฅ‡ Covidence

Robust workflow support combined with user-friendly AI assistance

๐Ÿ” EPPI-Reviewer

More mature AI features integrated within full systematic review platform

๐Ÿค– RobotReviewer

Extends automation beyond screening into critical appraisal stages

๐Ÿงฐ Rayyan

Balanced AI assistance with ease of use and accessibility

๐Ÿ“Š Summary Table

Tool Strengths Why Better Than ASReview
Covidence Integrated AI screening, collaboration Robust workflow, team-friendly, widely used
EPPI-Reviewer Advanced ML text mining, full workflow Mature AI and review stage integration
RobotReviewer Automated bias assessment with transparency Extends automation to critical appraisal
Rayyan Easy to use AI-assisted screening Accessible, collaborative, balanced AI

๐Ÿง  Final Recommendation