====== Parasellar Ligaments ======

{{rss>https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/rss/search/1-ePM6TuRYDeKISr_G1Xe8Zh-Da7WWDhT31_kjeSIzC056BMQ2/?limit=15&utm_campaign=pubmed-2&fc=20250620015446}}

[[Parasellar]] ligaments are [[fibrous]] [[connective tissue]] [[band]]s located within the [[parasellar region]], particularly around the [[cavernous sinus]]. They are thought to provide structural [[compartmentalization]] and [[stabilization]] of [[neurovascular]] elements in this anatomically complex area.

🧬 Anatomical Context:

Location: Medial wall of the [[cavernous sinus]], adjacent to the [[pituitary gland]], [[internal carotid artery]], and [[cranial nerve]]s III–VI.

Composition: Dense [[collagenous]] tissue, part of the meningeal and dural reflections.

Observed in: [[Cadaveric dissection]]s, [[neurosurgical procedures]], and (rarely) high-resolution [[MRI]] studies.

📚 Surgical Relevance (Theoretical):

Resection of the medial wall of the [[cavernous sinus]] (where these ligaments are anchored) has been associated with better outcomes in functioning pituitary adenomas.

The ligaments themselves, however, are not independent surgical targets, and their identification on imaging has no validated role in planning or executing surgery.

⚠️ Critical Perspective:

Not routinely visible on conventional imaging.

📉 Conclusion:

While the parasellar ligaments exist anatomically, their relevance in imaging and surgery remains marginal, and efforts to elevate their role based on anecdotal imaging findings are often [[clinically irrelevant]] and scientifically overstated.
----
In a [[anatomic-imaging correlation study]] with a [[single-case]] MR + dissection design Mark el al. 
((Mark IT, In MH, Kang D, Stinson E, Huston J, Shu Y, Leonel L, Celda MP. High-[[Resolution]] [[MR]] [[Imaging]] of the [[Parasellar]] [[Ligament]]s. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2025 Jun 19. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A8658. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 40537286.))
from the Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA, Department of Neurosurgery, University of Valencia
and Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología (IVO), Valencia, Spain
publiseh in the [[American Journal of Neuroradiology]] (AJNR)
to determine whether high-resolution T2-weighted MRI can visualize the parasellar ligaments, which have previously only been described in cadaveric dissection or intraoperative findings, and to correlate these MRI findings with anatomical dissection in the same specimen.
The authors report that parasellar ligaments can be identified on high-resolution T2-weighted MRI as T2-hypointense, bandlike structures originating from the medial wall of the cavernous sinus. They claim that identifying these ligaments may be relevant, given that resection of the medial wall of the cavernous sinus has been associated with better outcomes in [[functioning pituitary adenoma]] surgery.
----
This study is a prime example of [[technological overreach]] dressed up as [[discovery]]. It takes a single [[cadaver]], applies ultra-high-resolution [[MRI]], and then retrofits a minor [[fibrous band]] into a clinical “finding.” The result is a beautifully imaged, [[clinically irrelevant]] piece of anatomical [[embroidery]] that contributes nothing actionable to [[radiology]], [[neurosurgery]], or [[pituitary surgery]].

❌ Critical Flaws

1. [[Sample Size]] = 1

This is not a study. It’s an anatomical [[anecdote]] with MRI. No [[reproducibility]], no [[variability]], no statistical value. It offers the [[illusion]] of [[science]] without the burden of [[method]].

2. Speculative Clinical Relevance

The authors loosely associate the imaging of parasellar ligaments with [[surgical outcome]]s in [[pituitary adenoma]], despite zero clinical data, no patient [[cohort]], and no intraoperative [[validation]]. This is an exercise in wishful correlation masquerading as translational science.

3. Overinterpretation of Imaging

The so-called [[T2]]-[[hypointense]] "bandlike structures" are interpreted as parasellar ligaments with no histologic proof, no differentiation from adjacent [[fibrous]] tissues, and no comparison across multiple specimens or live imaging. Could it be artifact, [[fascia]], or [[vessel wall]]? The authors don’t bother to ask.

4. Redundancy with Existing Literature

The parasellar [[ligament]]s have already been described in [[surgical anatomy]]. Rewrapping them with [[MRI]] adds no functional [[knowledge]], only visual [[novelty]]. This is not innovation—it’s anatomical [[redecoration]].

5. Journal Standards Questioned

That AJNR accepted and published this [[article]] suggests a troubling [[editorial laxity]]: prioritizing image quality over clinical impact, and novelty over substance.

📉 Conclusion

What we have here is a single-case, ultra-specialized, low-evidence paper pretending to offer a new radiological frontier. In reality, it is an [[aesthetic showcase]] with no clinical [[consequence]], no [[reproducibility]], and no [[justification]] for its [[conclusion]]s. It stands as a [[case study]] in radiological [[self-indulgence]]—an MRI mirage of significance