====== Microvascular decompression for hemifacial spasm ====== {{rss>https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/rss/search/1bUrbZONKdK_6mFI3uGrhsbe5bgi9coMUtx2P6Jq9pgre8nka7/?limit=15&utm_campaign=pubmed-2&fc=20221213023201}} {{ ::microvascular_decompression_for_hemifacial_spasm.jpg?200|}} see also [[Hemifacial spasm treatment]]. ---- ---- When a penetrating pattern was encountered during MVD surgery, decompression between the penetrating offender and the facial nerve may offer good results ((Lee HS, Park K. Penetrating Offenders in Hemifacial Spasm: Surgical Tactics and Prognosis. Life (Basel). 2023 Oct 7;13(10):2021. doi: 10.3390/life13102021. PMID: 37895403; PMCID: PMC10608199.)). ---- Many [[ablative]] [[procedure]]s are effective for [[hemifacial spasm]] (HFS) (including sectioning of divisions of the [[facial nerve]]), however, this leaves the patient with some degree of facial paresis. The current procedure of choice for HFS is [[microvascular decompression]] (MVD) wherein the offending [[vessel]] is physically moved off of the nerve, and a [[sponge]] (e.g. [[Ivalon]]®, polyvinyl formyl alcohol foam) is interposed as a [[cushion]]. Other cushions may not prove to be as satisfactory ([[muscle]] may disappear, and [[Teflon]] felt may thin ((Rhoton AL. Comment on Payner T D and Tew J M: Recurrence of Hemifacial Spasm After Microvascular Decompression. Neurosurgery. 1996; 38))). Most often, the offending vessel approaches the nerve at a right angle, and causes grooving in the nerve. Compression must occur at the root exit zone; decompression of vessels impinging distal to this area is usually ineffective. Intra-operative [[brainstem auditory evoked potentials]] ([[BAER]]), ((Friedman WA, Kaplan BJ, Gravenstein D, et al. Int raoperative Brain-Stem Auditory Evoked Potentials During Posterior Fossa Microvascular Decompression. J Neurosurg. 1985; 62:552–557)) or more applicable, direct VIII nerve monitoring ((Moller AR, Jannetta PJ. Monitoring Auditory Functions During Cranial Nerve Microvascular Decompression Operations by Direct Recording from the Eighth Nerve. J Neurosurg. 1983; 59:493–499)) may help prevent hearing loss during MVD for 7th or 8th nerve dysfunction. Furthermore, monitoring for the disappearance of the (delayed) synkinetic response may aid in determining when adequate decompression has been achieved (generally reserved for teaching institutions) ((Moller AR, Jannetta PJ. Microvascular Decompression in Hemifacial Spasm: Intraoperative Electrophysiological Observations. Neurosurgery. 1985; 16:612–618)). The facial nerve should not be manipulated, and one should avoid dissection around the VII and VIII nerves near the IAC ((Fukushima T, Carter LP, Spetzler RF, Hamilton MG. In: Microvascular Decompression for Hemifacial Spasm: Results in 2890 Cases. Neurovascular Surgery. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1995:1133–1145)). Vessels must be preserved, especially the cochlear artery and small perforators. Place gentle medial traction on the cerebellum (<1 cm is recommended ((Fukushima T, Carter LP, Spetzler RF, Hamilton MG. In: Microvascular Decompression for Hemifacial Spasm: Results in 2890 Cases. Neurovascular Surgery. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1995:1133–1145)) ), and incise the arachnoid membrane between the flocculus and the eighth nerve (to avoid tension on nerves that could cause post-op deficit). The IX nerve may be followed medially from the jugular foramen to locate the origin of the VII nerve (the origin of VII is 4 mm cephalad and 2 mm anterior to that of the IX nerve ((Rhoton AL. Microsurgical Anatomy of the Brainstem Surface Facing an Acoustic Neuroma. Surg Neurol. 1986; 25:326–339 ))). ---- Redo MVD remains a feasible treatment option for HFS patients who have failed to benefit from prior MVD, but is associated with higher risks of cranial nerve and vascular injuries ((Lee S, Park SK, Lee JA, Joo BE, Park K. Missed Culprits in Failed Microvascular Decompression Surgery for Hemifacial Spasm and Expenses for Redo Surgery. World Neurosurg. 2019 May 31. pii: S1878-8750(19)31508-6. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.05.231. [Epub ahead of print] PubMed PMID: 31158550. )). ===== Planning ===== Three-dimensional reconstructions were found to provide much clearer characterization of this area than traditional preoperative imaging. Therefore, Teton et al., suggest that use of these reconstructions in the preoperative setting has the potential to help identify appropriate surgical candidates, guide [[preoperative planning]], and thus improve [[outcome]] in patients with HFS ((Teton ZE, Blatt D, Holste K, Raslan AM, Burchiel KJ. Utilization of 3D imaging reconstructions and assessment of symptom-free survival after microvascular decompression of the facial nerve in hemifacial spasm. J Neurosurg. 2019 Jul 12:1-8. doi: 10.3171/2019.4.JNS183207. [Epub ahead of print] PubMed PMID: 31299649. )). ===== Position ===== The classic surgical [[position]] for [[microvascular decompression]] (MVD) is [[lateral decubitus position]] with the [[head]] rotated 10 degrees away from the affected side. Ko et al. measured the angles of the [[posterior fossa]], specifically focusing on the surgical corridors used in MVD surgery for [[hemifacial spasm]] (HFS), to identify the proper surgical [[position]]. The following parameters were assessed on preoperative magnetic resonance images (MRI): petrous angle (PA), sigmoid angle (SA), sigmoid diameter (SD), and root exit zone-sigmoid sinus edge angle (REZ-SEA). The mean PA was 59.7 ± 5.6 degrees, SA was 16.8 ± 8.6 degrees, SD was 13.4 ± 3.5 mm, and the mean REZ-SEA was 59.6 ± 5.8 degrees. The difference between the maximum SA to avoid cerebellar hemisphere injury and the minimum REZ-SEA required to verify the facial nerve REZ is assumed to be the usable range of angles for the operative microscope; the average midpoint of this range was 38.2 ± 6.4 degrees. Turning the patient's head 10 degrees away from the affected side was generally appropriate for performing MVD surgery because it provided a mean microscope angle of 48 degrees. However, some patients had corner values for the sigmoid angle, REZ-SEA, and sigmoid sinus diameter. Rotating a patient's head based on precise calculations from preoperative MRI helps to achieve successful surgery ((Ko HC, Lee SH, Shin HS. Proper Head Rotation when Performing Microvascular Decompression for Hemifacial Spasm: An Orthometric Consideration Based on Preoperative MRI. J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg. 2022 Feb 15. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1725950. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 35170003.)). ===== Skin incision ===== “5–5-5” incision (5mm medial, extending 5cm up to 5cm down), used for approach to seventh/ eighth nerve complex: ===== Intraoperative Findings ===== [[Microvascular decompression for hemifacial spasm intraoperative findings]]. ===== Videos ===== A video demonstrates the surgical steps of a MVD at left facial REZ in a 41-year-old man who presented with typical hemifacial spasm on the left side due to VIIth nerve REZ compression by PICA. A classical retromastoid and infrafloccular approach was performed to avoid stretching of the VIIIth nerve and access the VIIth nerve ventro-caudally. The next step is insertion-along the brainstem, VII-VIIIth nerves REZ, and flocculus-of a plaque made of Teflon felt (Edward-type) which is semi-rigid, and by principle does not exert direct compression on the facial REZ, thus avoiding compression and/or transmission of pulsations on the VIIth nerve. The patient's postoperative period was uneventful and clinical outcome good ((Sindou M, Esqueda-Liquidano M, Brinzeu A. Microvascular Decompression for Hemifacial Spasm. Neurosurgery. 2014 Sep 24. [Epub ahead of print] PubMed PMID: 25255262. )) ===== Routine postoperative admission ===== [[Postoperative]] neurocritical [[intensive care unit]] (NICU) [[admission]] of patients who underwent [[craniotomy]] for close observation is common practice. Hatipoglu Majernik et al. performed a [[comparative analysis]] to determine if there is a real need for NICU admission after [[microvascular decompression]] (MVD) for [[cranial nerve]] disorders or whether it may be abandoned. The study evaluates a consecutive series of 236 MVD surgeries performed for treatment of [[trigeminal neuralgia]] (213), [[hemifacial spasm]] (17), vago[[glossopharyngeal neuralgia]] (2), paroxysmal [[vertigo]] (2), and [[pulsatile tinnitus]] (2). All patients were operated by the senior surgeon according to a standard protocol over a period of 12 years. Patients were admitted routinely to NICU during the first phase of the study (phase I), while in the second phase (phase II), only patients with specific indications would go to NICU. While 105 patients (44%) were admitted to NICU postoperatively (phase I), 131 patients (56%) returned to the ward after a short stay in a postanaesthesia care unit (PACU) (phase II). Specific indications for NICU admission in phase I were pneumothorax secondary to central venous catheter insertion (4 patients), AV block during surgery, low blood oxygen levels after extubation, and postoperative [[dysphagia]] and [[dysphonia]] (1 patient, respectively). There were no significant differences in the distribution of ASA scores or the presence of cardiac and pulmonary comorbidities like congestive heart failure, arterial hypertension, or [[chronic obstructive pulmonary disease]] between groups. There were no secondary referrals from PACU to NICU. Our study shows that routine admission of patients after eventless MVD to NICU does not provide additional value. NICU admission can be restricted to patients with specific indications. When MVD surgery is performed in experienced hands according to a standard anaesthesia protocol, clinical observation on a neurosurgical ward is sufficient to monitor the postoperative course. Such a policy results in substantial savings of costs and human resources ((Hatipoglu Majernik G, Wolff Fernandes F, Al-Afif S, Heissler HE, Palmaers T, Atallah O, Scheinichen D, Krauss JK. Routine postoperative admission to the neurocritical intensive care unit after microvascular decompression: necessary or can it be abandoned? Neurosurg Rev. 2022 Dec 9;46(1):12. doi: 10.1007/s10143-022-01910-4. PMID: 36482263.)). ===== Outcome ===== [[Microvascular decompression for hemifacial spasm outcome]] ===== Complications ===== see [[Microvascular decompression for hemifacial spasm complications]]. ===== Transposition in microvascular decompression for hemifacial spasm ===== [[Transposition in microvascular decompression for hemifacial spasm]]. ===== Observational cohort studies ===== A single-center cohort of 55 [[hemifacial spasm]] patients completed a [[questionnaire]] approximately 5 years following [[microvascular decompression]]. Data encompassed [[tinnitus]] presence, side, type, onset, and severity measured by a 10-point [[Visual Analogue Scale]] (VAS). Descriptive, correlation, and logistic regression analyses were conducted. RESULTS : At surgery, participants' median age was 58 years (IQR 52-65). The median duration of HFS symptoms before surgery was 5 years (IQR 3-8), slightly predominant on the left (60%). Postoperative tinnitus was reported by 20 patients (36%), versus nine (16%) that reported preoperative tinnitus. Postoperative tinnitus was ipsilateral on the surgical side in 13 patients (65%), bilateral in six (30%), and contralateral in one (5%). Among patients with bilateral postoperative tinnitus, 33% did not have this preoperatively. Tinnitus was continuous in 70% of cases and pulsatile in 30%. Onset of new tinnitus was in 58% immediately or within days, in 25% within three months, and in 17% between three months and one year after surgery. The mean severity of postoperative tinnitus was 5.1 points on the VAS. Preoperative tinnitus and presence of arachnoid adhesions had suggestive associations with postoperative tinnitus in initial analyses (p = 0.005 and p = 0.065). However, preoperative tinnitus was the only significant predictor of postoperative tinnitus (p = 0.011). Tinnitus is a common condition following [[microvascular decompression for hemifacial spasm]], with a moderate overall severity. Causes behind postoperative tinnitus remain obscure but could be related to those of postoperative hearing loss in this patient population. Clinicians should be aware of tinnitus following MVD and vigilantly monitor its occurrence, to facilitate prevention efforts and optimize outcome for HFS patients undergoing MVD ((Albakri LBM, Mennink LM, Tamasi K, Drost G, van Dijk P, van Dijk JMC. [[Tinnitus]]: an underreported condition following [[microvascular decompression for hemifacial spasm]]. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2024 May 9;166(1):207. doi: 10.1007/s00701-024-06103-0. PMID: 38719997.)) ===== Case series ===== Al Menabbawy et al. extracted retrospective data of patients who received [[Indocyanine green videoangiography]] from a prospectively maintained [[database]] for [[microvascular decompression]]. They noted relevant data including demographics, offending vessels, operative technique, outcome, and complications. Out of the 438 patients, 15 patients with a mean age (SD) of 53 ± 10.5 years underwent intraoperative ICG angiography. Male: female was 1:1.14. The mean disease duration prior to surgery was 7.7 ± 5.3 years. The mean follow-up (SD) was 50.7 ± 42.0 months. In 14 patients, the offending vessel was an artery, and in one patient, a vein. Intraoperative readjustment of the Teflon pledget or sling was required in 20% (3/15) of the cases. No patient had any sort of brainstem ischemia. Eighty percent of the patients (12/15) experienced complete resolution of the spasms. 86.7% (13/15) of the patients reported a satisfactory outcome with marked improvement of the spasms. Three patients experienced slight hearing affection after surgery, which improved in two patients later. There was no facial or lower cranial nerve affection. Intraoperative ICG is a safe tool for evaluating the flow within the brain stem perforators and avoiding [[brainstem stroke]] in MVD for hemifacial spasm ((Al Menabbawy A, Refaee EE, Shoubash L, Matthes M, Schroeder HWS. The value of intraoperative indocyanine green angiography in microvascular decompression for hemifacial spasm to avoid brainstem ischemia. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2022 Oct 27. doi: 10.1007/s00701-022-05389-2. Epub ahead of print. Erratum in: Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2022 Nov 28;: PMID: 36289111.)). ===== References =====