===== Low-Impact Publication =====

A **low-impact [[publication]]** is a [[scientific article]] that contributes minimally to the advancement of knowledge, clinical practice, or methodological innovation, often due to poor design, limited novelty, or lack of rigorous analysis.

==== 🔍 Definition ====
> ''A low-impact publication is a study or report that offers little to no meaningful addition to its field, typically characterized by weak evidence, limited relevance, or excessive redundancy with existing literature.''

==== ⚠️ Common Features ====
  * Small sample size with no statistical power  
  * No hypothesis or exploratory aim  
  * Redundant case reports or procedural notes  
  * Overinterpretation of minor findings  
  * Published in journals with limited peer review or poor editorial standards  
  * Short follow-up and lack of clinical endpoints  
  * Disconnected from broader research or evidence-based frameworks

==== ❌ Why It Matters ====
  * Saturates the scientific literature with noise  
  * Obstructs systematic reviews and meta-analyses  
  * Wastes resources (time, indexing, peer review)  
  * Rewards academic volume over quality  
  * Undermines trust in scholarly communication

==== 🧠 Examples (Generalized) ====
  * “We treated 2 patients with Method Z. No complications occurred. We recommend its use.”  
  * “Case report of a common condition with no novel presentation, diagnostic approach, or management strategy.”

==== 📉 Contrast with High-Impact Research ====
^ Criteria ^ High-Impact ^ Low-Impact ^
| Novelty | ✅ Yes | ❌ No |
| Methodological Rigor | ✅ Controlled, powered | ❌ Anecdotal |
| Relevance | ✅ Alters clinical practice | ❌ Marginal |
| Citability | ✅ Frequently cited | ❌ Rarely cited |
| Generalizability | ✅ Broad utility | ❌ Narrow, isolated |

==== 🧾 Related Concepts ====
  * [[Academic dilution]]  
  * [[Journal padding ]] 
  * [[Technical anecdote ]] 
  * [[Predatory publishing ]] 
  * [[Publication inflation]]