====== Journal of Personalized Medicine ====== The **Journal of Personalized Medicine (JPM)** is an open-access, peer-reviewed journal published by **MDPI**, focusing on research that promotes individualized approaches in clinical practice. Its scope spans genomics, biomarker development, precision therapeutics, and patient-centered care models across multiple disciplines, including [[oncology]], [[cardiology]], and [[neurosurgery]]. === Strengths === * Rapid publication timelines and open-access availability. * Wide range of topics related to **precision and personalized medicine**. * Inclusion of emerging technologies such as [[3D printing]], [[AI in medicine]], and [[genomics]]. === Limitations and Criticisms === * Published by **MDPI**, a publisher frequently criticized for: - **Volume-driven publishing** rather than editorial selectivity. - **Aggressive solicitation** of submissions and guest editors. - Potentially **weaker peer review standards** compared to top-tier journals. * Many articles, especially in technical innovation, resemble **[[aesthetic showcase]]s** or [[promotional material]], lacking [[robust evidence]] or clinical trial data. * Limited presence of **randomized controlled trials**, **meta-analyses**, or large-scale studies with high-level [[evidence-based medicine]]. * Risk of contributing to **technophilic bias** in the absence of critical appraisal. === Academic Value === JPM may serve as a **platform for exploratory concepts**, case series, and early-stage innovations, but its content should be **interpreted cautiously**, especially when used to inform clinical decisions. For publications intending to change practice, **journals with stricter peer-review protocols** (e.g., *The Lancet*, *NEJM*, *JAMA*, *Journal of Neurosurgery*) remain more authoritative. === Conclusion === While the **Journal of Personalized Medicine** offers visibility for niche and novel ideas, it lacks the methodological rigor and impact factor associated with **serious academic literature**. Clinicians and researchers should critically assess its articles and corroborate findings with higher-tier sources before adopting conclusions into practice.