While [[Artificial intelligence]] improves [[accessibility]] and [[efficiency]] in academic writing, its limitations in [[clinical experience]], [[originality]], and [[nuanced analysis]] highlight the need for human [[oversight]]. The integration of AI should be as a complementary tool rather than a [[replacement]] for [[human expertise]]. Future research should focus on refining AI's analytical capabilities and ensuring ethical use in [[scientific publishing]]
((Fauziah RR, Puspita AMI, Yuliana I, Ummah FS, Mufarochah S, Ramadhani E. [[Artificial intelligence]] in academic writing: Enhancing or replacing human expertise? J Clin Neurosci. 2025 Mar 19:111193. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2025.111193. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 40113532.))