====== Anatomical Record ======

===== 📌 General Information =====
*The Anatomical Record* is a peer-reviewed journal published by Wiley on behalf of the American Association for Anatomy (AAA). Founded in 1906, it focuses on morphological, developmental, and histological studies in human and comparative anatomy.

  * **Impact Factor (2024)**: ~2.0  
  * **Frequency**: Monthly  
  * **Access**: Hybrid (subscription + open access)  
  * **Publisher**: Wiley / American Association for Anatomy

----

===== 🧪 Scope and Relevance =====
**Strengths**:
  * Strong focus on **3D imaging**, **morphometry**, and **tissue architecture**.
  * Useful for research on **muscle regeneration**, **adipose grafting**, and **neuroanatomical mapping**.
  * Includes detailed anatomical visualizations for teaching and reference.

**Limitations**:
  * Often **descriptive rather than mechanistic** in nature.
  * Clinical relevance is limited unless directly linked to surgical or diagnostic applications.
  * Scope includes articles on non-human models or paleontology, which may dilute medical interest.

----

===== 🧬 Scientific Rigor =====
  * High-quality **methodological detail**, especially in imaging and histology.
  * **Statistical analysis** is sometimes minimal or secondary to qualitative descriptions.
  * **Peer review process** is consistent, but impact depends heavily on the article's topic and depth.

----

===== 🧰 Usefulness for Neurosurgeons =====
**Potentially useful for**:
  * **Neuroanatomical variability** in skull base, cranial nerves, or spinal anatomy.
  * Preclinical models for **tissue engineering** or **nerve repair**.
  * Educational resources (e.g., 3D reconstructions, anatomical atlases).

**Less useful for**:
  * Clinical outcomes, surgical techniques, or evidence-based neurosurgical practice.
  * Rapidly evolving fields like neuro-oncology or functional neurosurgery.

----

===== 📉 Weaknesses =====
  * **Fragmented scope**: spans from fossils to human bioprinting, lacking thematic focus.
  * **Language clarity** varies depending on the author's origin and editorial attention.
  * **Open-access fees** are high (~3000 USD), which limits global accessibility.

----

===== 🔍 Comparison Table =====
^ Journal                        ^ Impact Factor ^ Primary Focus                        ^ Target Audience         ^
| *The Anatomical Record*       | ~2.0          | Histology, anatomy, 3D reconstruction | Anatomists, educators    |
| *Journal of Anatomy*          | ~2.5          | Classical and developmental anatomy   | Academic researchers     |
| *Clinical Anatomy*            | ~2.4          | Applied and surgical anatomy          | Surgeons, clinicians      |
| *Brain Structure and Function*| ~4.0          | Neuroanatomy and functional mapping   | Neuroscientists, neurologists |

----

===== 🧾 Conclusion =====
*The Anatomical Record* is a respected but mid-tier journal in anatomical sciences. It provides value to researchers in structural biology and educators in anatomy, but it has limited direct utility for high-impact clinical neuroscience or evidence-driven neurosurgery.