We should accept that peer [[reviewer]]s when they perform a good [[review]], contributed to the final version of the [[article]] more so than many of the individuals listed in the [[acknowledgment]]s section. Unfortunately, [[journal]]s, [[indexer]]s, [[academic institution]]s, and funding bodies are not considering these [[contribution]]s as curricular [[merit]]s. Pharmacy Practice started a new [[practice]] of including all peer reviewers of the past year as part of the collective [[author]] in the first [[editorial]] of the new year. Thus, their names are searchable in [[PubMed]] using the [IR] field descriptor
((Fernandez-Llimos F Pharmacy Practice 2018 peer reviewers. Peer review and publication delay. Pharm Pract (Granada) 2019;17(1):1502. doi: 10.18549/PharmPract.2019.1.1502)).
((Fernandez-Llimos F Pharmacy Practice 2017 peer reviewers. Scholarly publishing depends on peer reviewers. Pharm Pract (Granada) 2018;16(1):1236. doi: 10.18549/PharmPract.2018.01.1236.)).