Show pageBacklinksCite current pageExport to PDFBack to top This page is read only. You can view the source, but not change it. Ask your administrator if you think this is wrong. ====== World Journal of Clinical Cases ====== **Publisher:** Baishideng Publishing Group **Format:** Open Access, English-language **Frequency:** Three issues per month **Review Process:** Single-blind peer review **Scope:** Case reports, clinical research, reviews, guidelines ===== Impact and Metrics ===== * **Impact Factor (2023):** ≈ 1.0 (5-year IF ~1.1) * **H-index:** ~30 * **SCIE-indexed:** Yes * **Ranking:** Q3 (Medicine, General & Internal) * **Average Citations per Article:** < 2 * **Article Volume (2021):** ~1,300 (up from ~70 in 2017) ===== Strengths ===== * ✅ Open access with rapid publication cycles (~1 month) * ✅ Indexed in SCIE and PubMed Central * ✅ Declared adherence to COPE ethical guidelines * ✅ Useful for early-career authors needing visibility or academic credits ===== Weaknesses ===== * ⚠️ **Quantity over Quality**: Rapid growth has diluted scientific value * ⚠️ **Minimal Peer Review Rigor**: Many articles accepted with superficial scrutiny * ⚠️ **Low Citability**: Most case reports have minimal academic influence * ⚠️ **Middling Prestige**: Q3 ranking limits institutional recognition * ⚠️ **Predatory Optics**: Expansion strategy and APC model raise concerns, despite technical indexing * ⚠️ **Lack of Editorial Selectivity**: Frequent publication of anecdotal, non-hypothesis-generating reports ===== Summary Table ===== ^ Attribute ^ Evaluation ^ | Visibility | ★★★☆☆ (SCIE-indexed, PubMed Central) | | Scientific Rigor | ★★☆☆☆ (Single-blind, often superficial) | | Citation Impact | ★☆☆☆☆ (Low citations per article) | | Ethical Standing | ★★★★☆ (COPE-compliant, no major misconduct reported) | | Ideal For | Rapid dissemination of low-impact clinical observations | ===== Final Assessment ===== World Journal of Clinical Cases offers a fast-track, open-access outlet for case reports, but at the cost of academic rigor and long-term influence. Its role is primarily archival and descriptive rather than investigational or hypothesis-generating. It is best seen as a **platform for documentation**, not for advancing the scientific frontier. > ''Use cautiously. Suitable for descriptive cases, but inappropriate for research intended to shift clinical paradigms.'' world_journal_of_clinical_cases.txt Last modified: 2025/06/17 15:34by administrador