Show pageBacklinksCite current pageExport to PDFBack to top This page is read only. You can view the source, but not change it. Ask your administrator if you think this is wrong. ===== 📚 The Oncologist ===== **Publisher:** Oxford University Press **Focus:** Clinical oncology, including medical, radiation, and surgical oncology. Increasing interest in radiogenomics, AI, and “translational” studies. **Indexing:** PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus **Impact Factor (2024):** ~5.2 (mid-tier) **Strengths:** * Accessible clinical focus — not just bench science. * Willing to publish hybrid studies involving AI, radiomics, and treatment outcomes. * Maintains good editorial standards and ethical transparency. **Weaknesses:** * Increasing tolerance for **hype-heavy, validation-light studies**, especially involving machine learning. * Often features **studies with modest sample sizes** dressed up in technical vocabulary. * Peer review sometimes misses methodological shallowness masked by buzzwords like “deep learning,” “radiogenomics,” or “real-world data.” **Tone of the Journal:** > Serious — but easily seduced by novelty. Think of it as **JCO’s younger cousin who just discovered Python and heatmaps**. **Bottom Line:** *The Oncologist* is a **respectable mid-tier journal** for clinical oncology — but with a growing tendency to publish **translational window dressing**. Perfect for papers that look like breakthroughs, as long as no one reads the methods too closely. → Best consumed critically. Preferably with a red pen and a reality filter. the_oncologist.txt Last modified: 2025/06/22 04:34by administrador