Scientific Reports [Neurosurgery Wiki]

This page is read only. You can view the source, but not change it. Ask your administrator if you think this is wrong.
====== Scientific Reports ======

**Publisher**: Nature Portfolio (Springer Nature)
**ISSN**: 2045-2322
**Launch Year**: 2011
**Open Access**: Yes
**Impact Factor (2023)**: \~4.6
**Article Processing Charges (APC)**: \~\$2,000 USD
**Frequency**: Continuous publication

\===== Scope and Aim =====
*Scientific Reports* is a multidisciplinary, peer-reviewed, open-access journal that aims to rapidly disseminate research across all areas of the natural and clinical sciences. It accepts technically sound studies without requiring a demonstration of novelty or broad interest.

\===== Strengths =====

**1. Rapid and Transparent Publishing**

* Continuous publication model and streamlined editorial process lead to fast dissemination.
* Open-access format promotes visibility and accessibility.

**2. Technical Soundness Over Impact**

* Articles are accepted if scientifically and methodologically valid, regardless of perceived significance.
* This supports reproducibility and mitigates publication bias against negative or confirmatory studies.

**3. Multidisciplinary Breadth**

* Covers a vast range of disciplines, enabling cross-field citations and broader academic reach.

**4. Backed by Nature Portfolio**

* Strong editorial infrastructure and indexing in major databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science).

\===== Weaknesses =====

**1. Lower Perceived Prestige in Clinical Fields**

* Despite the Nature branding, many clinical academics consider it a “second-tier” outlet.
* Lacks the clinical rigor and editorial curation of specialist journals.

**2. APC vs. Perceived Impact**

* Article Processing Charges (\~\$2,000) are relatively high compared to perceived prestige and citation value.
* Value-for-cost ratio may be questioned in resource-limited settings or for early-career researchers.

**3. Variable Quality**

* Acceptance based on technical soundness leads to a wide range in article impact and relevance.
* Requires careful reader discernment, especially for clinical application.

**4. Susceptibility to Citation Inflation**

* Some authors may use it for strategic citation building, given its rapid publication and open-access reach.

\===== Relevance to Neurosurgery and Clinical Medicine =====

* **Limited**: Most high-impact clinical neurosurgical studies prefer specialized journals (e.g., *JNS*, *Neurosurgery*, *Brain*, *Stroke*).
* **Useful for**: Pilot studies, technical validations, interdisciplinary collaborations, negative findings, or computational neuroscience.

\
===== Summary Judgment =====

**Scientific Reports** occupies a useful niche in open-access scientific publishing, prioritizing technical rigor over novelty. While it lacks the prestige of flagship clinical journals, its broad reach and open-access model support transparency and early dissemination. However, its use in neurosurgery and clinical decision-making should be critical and selective.

> “Scientifically sound but not necessarily practice-changing.”