Show pageBacklinksCite current pageExport to PDFBack to top This page is read only. You can view the source, but not change it. Ask your administrator if you think this is wrong. [[Brachial plexus palsy]] is a surgically manageable condition. Re-animating the [[shoulder]] is a high priority for restoring upper extremity function. Methods for reinnervating injured nerves include the transfer of a healthy [[nerve]] or fascicle distal to the site of injury, or [[grafting]] a healthy sensory nerve to restore motor function. Studies aiming to compare these two techniques for restoring [[shoulder abduction]] have yielded conflicting results. Hardcastle et al., conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis following the [[PRISMA guideline]]s. They reviewed the PubMed database for studies comparing [[nerve transfer]] and nerve grafting for [[shoulder abduction]] published by December 2018. Outcomes using the Medical Research Scale (MRC) for muscle strength were assessed using a random effects model meta-analysis. Five studies comprising a total of 212 patients (n = 158, nerve transfer; n = 54, nerve grafts) were used for the analysis. The rate of functional recovery of shoulder function was slightly better for nerve transfer (n = 114/158, 72%) than for nerve graft patients (n = 36/54, 67%). However, this was not statistically significant (OR 1.34, 95% CI 0.27-6.72, I2 = 62.9%). [[Nerve transfer]] and [[grafting]] are similarly effective in terms of [[shoulder abduction]]. Future prospective studies are needed to validate the [[result]]s and identify the optimal shoulder re-animation strategy in patients with brachial plexus injuries ((Hardcastle N, Texakalidis P, Nagarajan P, Tora MS, Boulis NM. Recovery of shoulder abduction in traumatic brachial plexus palsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of nerve transfer versus nerve graft. Neurosurg Rev. 2019 Apr 17. doi: 10.1007/s10143-019-01100-9. [Epub ahead of print] Review. PubMed PMID: 30997618. )). nerve_grafting.txt Last modified: 2024/06/07 02:52by 127.0.0.1