Show pageBacklinksCite current pageExport to PDFBack to top This page is read only. You can view the source, but not change it. Ask your administrator if you think this is wrong. For those who want an R2 that behaves like a linear-model R2, this is deeply unsettling. There is a simple correction, and that is to divide R2C&S by its upper bound, which produces the R2 attributed to Nagelkerke (1991) nagelkerke_r2.txt Last modified: 2024/06/07 02:54by 127.0.0.1