Journal of Medical Case Reports [Neurosurgery Wiki]

This page is read only. You can view the source, but not change it. Ask your administrator if you think this is wrong.
====== Journal of Medical Case Reports  ======

=== 📄 Credibility & Indexing ===
  * **Publisher**: BioMed Central (part of Springer Nature).
  * **Established**: 2007.
  * **Indexing**: Included in Scopus, PubMed, and CINAHL.
  * **Impact Factor (2024)**: 
    * 2-year IF: '''0.8'''
    * 5-year IF: '''0.9'''
    * SNIP: '''0.677'''
    * SJR: '''0.310'''
  * The journal is considered legitimate and well-indexed but with modest academic influence.

=== 🕒 Editorial Process & Turnaround ===
  * **Median time to first decision**: '''32 days'''
  * **Median time to acceptance**: '''145 days'''
  * **Peer Review**: Structured and guided, especially supportive for early-career reviewers.

=== 📝 Scope & Article Types ===
  * Focuses on:
    * Rare or unusual presentations
    * Novel diagnostic or therapeutic approaches
    * Adverse drug reactions
    * "N-of-1" studies and prevalence data from case series
  * Includes clinical meta-analyses based on individual case reports.

=== 🔍 Strengths vs Weaknesses ===
^ Strengths ^ Considerations ^
| ✅ Open-access: High daily visibility (~11,400 accesses) and over 4.5 million downloads/year | ⚠️ Low impact factor, typical for case-report journals |
| ✅ Indexed in reputable databases (Scopus, PubMed) | ⚠️ Not suitable for researchers prioritizing high citation metrics |
| ✅ Transparent review process and editorial integrity | ⚠️ Less academic prestige compared to high-impact clinical journals |

=== 🧭 Comparison with Alternatives ===
  * **Compared to Cureus**:
    * Cureus has faster publication, but variable indexing and review stringency.
  * **Compared to major clinical journals** (e.g., *Mayo Clinic Proceedings*):
    * Those journals rarely accept isolated case reports unless embedded in broader research.

=== ✅ Recommendations ===
  * Suitable for:
    * Clinicians aiming to publish instructive or rare clinical observations.
    * Early-career authors seeking entry into peer-reviewed publication.
  * Less suited for:
    * Researchers focused on improving their h-index or aiming for high-impact journals.

=== ⚠️ Watchpoints ===
  * The journal is '''not predatory''': clear fees, legitimate peer-review, and ethical standards.
  * Always verify indexing status in Scopus/PubMed before submitting.
  * Avoid confusing with similarly named, non-indexed case-report outlets.

=== 📌 Conclusion ===
  * The *Journal of Medical Case Reports* is a reliable and well-indexed platform for publishing clinical case material.
  * It balances accessibility and visibility with rigorous but attainable editorial standards.
  * Not intended for high-impact scientific contribution, but highly useful for clinical documentation, education, and academic engagement.