Show pageBacklinksCite current pageExport to PDFBack to top This page is read only. You can view the source, but not change it. Ask your administrator if you think this is wrong. ====== Insular Cavernous Malformation Classification ====== Fioravanti et al. divided [[Insular Cavernous Malformation]] in 2 groups, according to a mainly pial growth pattern (exophytic group) or a subcortical one (endophytic group). Endophytic iCM was further subdivided in 3 subgroups, based on the insular gyri involved. According to this classification, each patient underwent a specific additional neuroimaging investigation and surgical evaluation. A total of 24 patients were included. In the surgical group, trans-sylvian (TS) approach was used in 6 patients with exophytic or Zone I endophytic iCMs. The transcortical (TC) approach with awake monitoring was used in 6 cases of Zone II endophytic vascular lesions. Both TS and trans-intraparietal sulcal (TIS) approach were used for 3 cases of Zone III endophytic iCM. At follow-up, 3 patients were fully recovered from a transient speech impairment while a permanent morbidity was observed in one case. The proposed iCM classification focuses on anatomical and functional concerns, aiming to suggest the best pre-operative work-up and the surgical evaluation ((Fioravanti A, Elia A, Morandini A, Valtulina C, Bertuccio A. Anatomo-functional evaluation for management and surgical treatment of insular cavernous malformation: a case series. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2022 Jan 23. doi: 10.1007/s00701-021-05089-3. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 35066681.)). insular_cavernous_malformation_classification.txt Last modified: 2024/06/07 02:56by 127.0.0.1