Show pageBacklinksCite current pageExport to PDFBack to top This page is read only. You can view the source, but not change it. Ask your administrator if you think this is wrong. Indirect [[evidence]], also sometimes referred to as circumstantial evidence, is a fact or set of facts that, if true, allow a person can infer the fact at issue. ---- [[Network meta-analysis]] (NMA) is a relatively recent development, which extends principles of [[meta-analysis]] to the [[evaluation]] of multiple [[treatment]]s in a single analysis. This is achieved by combining the direct and [[indirect evidence]]. [[Direct evidence]] refers to evidence obtained from [[randomized control trial]]s (RCTs); for example, in a trial comparing treatments A and B, direct evidence is the estimate of relative effects between A and B. [[indirect evidence]] refers to the evidence obtained through one or more common comparators. in the absence of RCTs that directly evaluate A and B, interventions A and B can be compared indirectly if both have been compared to C in studies (forming an A-B-C “loop” of evidence). The combination of [[direct evidence]] and [[indirect evidence]] is called [[mixed evidence]]. indirect_evidence.txt Last modified: 2024/06/07 02:49by 127.0.0.1