Show pageBacklinksCite current pageExport to PDFBack to top This page is read only. You can view the source, but not change it. Ask your administrator if you think this is wrong. ====== Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus ====== //[[J.Sales-Llopis]]// //Neurosurgery Department, [[General University Hospital Alicante]], [[Spain]]// ---- ===== Latest Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus PubMed-Related Articles ===== {{rss>https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/rss/search/1JmYa8PH-W6YcopTTNoTwgl-dgQihHdwqZds_5rUsGcqJW91HH/?limit=15&utm_campaign=pubmed-2&fc=20230704124516}} ===== Definition ===== [[Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus Definition]]. ===== History ===== see [[Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus history]]. ===== Epidemiology ===== [[Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus Epidemiology]]. ===== Classification ===== [[Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus Classification]]. ===== Natural History ===== [[Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus Natural History]]. ===== Etiology ===== [[Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus Etiology]]. ===== Pathogenesis ===== see [[Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus Pathogenesis]]. ===== Pathophysiology ===== see [[Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus pathophysiology]]. ===== Clinical Features ===== see [[Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus clinical features]]. ===== Scales ===== see [[Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus scales]]. ===== Diagnosis ===== see [[Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus diagnosis]]. ===== Differential diagnosis ===== see [[Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus differential diagnosis]]. ===== Guidelines ===== [[Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus guidelines]]. ===== Treatment ===== see [[Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus treatment]]. ===== Outcome ===== see [[Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus outcome]]. ===== Observational retrospective cohort studies ===== The Nationwide Readmissions Database was queried from 2018 to 2019 for iNPH patients aged ≥ 60 years who underwent VPS surgery. Risk Analysis Index and modified 5-item Frailty Index scores were calculated and RAI cross-tabulation was used to analyze trends in frailty scores by the following binary outcome measures: overall complications, nonhome discharge, extended length of stay > 75th percentile, and mortality. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to assess the discriminatory accuracy of RAI and mFI-5 for primary outcomes. Results: A total of 9319 iNPH patients underwent VPS surgery, and there were 685 readmissions, 7.4%, 593 perioperative complications, 6.4%, and 94 deaths, 1.0%. Increasing RAI score was significantly associated with increasing rates of postoperative complications: RAI scores 11-15, 5.4%, n = 80; 16-20, 5.6%, n = 291; 21-25, 7.6%, n = 166; and ≥ 26, 11.6%, n = 56. The discriminatory accuracy of RAI was statistically superior, DeLong test, p < 0.05, to mFI-5 for the primary endpoints of mortality, NHD, and eLOS. All RAI C-statistics were > 0.60 for mortality within 30 days, C-statistic = 0.69, 95% CI 0.68-0.70. Conclusions: In a nationwide database analysis, increasing frailty, as measured by RAI, was associated with NHD, 30-day mortality, unplanned readmission, eLOS, and postoperative complications. Although the RAI outperformed the mFI-5, it is essential to account for the potentially reversible clinical issues related to the underlying disease process, as these factors may inflate frailty scores, assign undue risk, and diminish their utility. This knowledge may enhance provider understanding of the impact of frailty on postoperative outcomes for patients with iNPH, while highlighting the potential constraints associated with frailty assessment tools. ((Courville E, Rumalla K, Kazim SF, Dicpinigaitis AJ, Schmidt M, Robinson TM, Bowers CA. Risk Analysis Index as a preoperative frailty tool for elective ventriculoperitoneal shunt surgery for idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. J Neurosurg. 2023 Oct 6;140:1110-1116. doi: 10.3171/2023.7.JNS23767. PMID: 38564806.)), ---- A study was conducted by visualizing a total of 1232 brain CT scans performed in the Emergency Departments of four hospitals of a network on patients who were admitted for different complaints yet screened as suspicious for iNPH. Subsequently, corresponding Emergency Department medical records were investigated to understand the medical history of each patient in search of elements attributable to an alteration of CSF dynamics. The cohort of positive CT scans, according to the radiological and clinical inclusion criteria, included 192 patients. Among the reasons to require acute medical care, "Fall" was the most common. The cumulative incidence of CT scans suggestive of iNPH among the patients undergoing CT scans was as high as 15.58%, and the period prevalence calculated for the total amount of patients accessing the Emergency Departments was 1.084%. The real incidence of iNPH in the population may be underestimated, and the social burden linked to the assistance of patients suffering from such untreated conditions could be significantly relieved ((Petrella G, Ciarlo S, Elia S, Piaz RD, Nucera P, Pompucci A, Palmieri M, Pesce A. Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus: The Real Social and Economic Burden of a Possibly Enormous Underdiagnosis Problem. Tomography. 2023 Oct 30;9(6):2006-2015. doi: 10.3390/tomography9060157. PMID: 37987343; PMCID: PMC10661316.)) ===== Case series ===== see [[Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus case series]]. ===== Case reports ===== see [[Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus case reports]]. ===== Experimental animal model ===== see [[Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus experimental animal model]]. idiopathic_normal_pressure_hydrocephalus.txt Last modified: 2024/10/08 07:43by 127.0.0.1