Show pageBacklinksCite current pageExport to PDFBack to top This page is read only. You can view the source, but not change it. Ask your administrator if you think this is wrong. ====== Hybrid Depth Electrodes ====== {{ ::hybrid_depth_electrodes.png?400|}} Carlson et al. from the [[Cedars-Sinai Medical Center]] reviewed the medical charts of 53 cases of [[medically refractory epilepsy]] operated on from [[2006]] to [[2017]], where both non-hybrid and hybrid microwire depth [[electrode]]s were used for intracranial [[monitoring]]. They assessed the localization accuracy and [[complication]]s that arose to assess the relative safety and utility of hybrid depth electrodes compared with standard electrodes. A total of 555 electrodes were implanted in 52 [[patient]]s. The overall per-electrode complication rate was 2.3%, with a per-case complication rate of 20.8%. There were no [[infection]]s or [[death]]s. Serious or hemorrhagic complications occurred in 2 patients (0.4% per-electrode risk). Complications did not correlate with the use of any particular electrode type, and hybrids were equally as reliable as standard electrodes in localizing seizure onset zones. [[Hybrid depth electrode]]s appear to be as safe and effective as standard depth electrodes for intracranial monitoring and provide unique opportunities to study the human brain at single-neuron resolution ((Carlson AA, Rutishauser U, Mamelak AN. Safety and Utility of Hybrid Depth Electrodes for Seizure Localization and Single-Unit Neuronal Recording. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 2018 Oct 16:1-9. doi: 10.1159/000493548. [Epub ahead of print] PubMed PMID: 30326475. )). hybrid_depth_electrode.txt Last modified: 2024/06/07 02:58by 127.0.0.1