Show pageBacklinksCite current pageExport to PDFBack to top This page is read only. You can view the source, but not change it. Ask your administrator if you think this is wrong. While [[Artificial intelligence]] improves [[accessibility]] and [[efficiency]] in academic writing, its limitations in [[clinical experience]], [[originality]], and [[nuanced analysis]] highlight the need for human [[oversight]]. The integration of AI should be as a complementary tool rather than a [[replacement]] for [[human expertise]]. Future research should focus on refining AI's analytical capabilities and ensuring ethical use in [[scientific publishing]] ((Fauziah RR, Puspita AMI, Yuliana I, Ummah FS, Mufarochah S, Ramadhani E. [[Artificial intelligence]] in academic writing: Enhancing or replacing human expertise? J Clin Neurosci. 2025 Mar 19:111193. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2025.111193. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 40113532.)) human_expertise.txt Last modified: 2025/03/21 13:32by 127.0.0.1